Seek Returns

NMR vs. TW: Nomura vs. Tradeweb Markets Stock Comparison

How do Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though NMR is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while TW falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.

Tradeweb Markets (TW) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
Profile ItemNMRTW
NameNomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADRTradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock
Country/RegionJapanUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryInvestment Banking & BrokerageFinancial Exchanges & Data
Market Capitalization27.53 billion USD27.59 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateDecember 17, 2001April 4, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

NMR
TW
GSPC
Loading price history…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
Total Return (1Y)35.42%17.01%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)37.86%11.65%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)18.78%6.31%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

NMR
TW
GSPC
Loading price history…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)29.52%30.82%
Beta (5Y)0.790.54
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.40%-48.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)789.26K1.37M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
NMR and TW are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.060.41
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.550.60

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 14.46% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

11.51%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
NMR
11.51%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

TW

Financial Services industry group

14.46%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
TW
14.46%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 39.86% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 17.12%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

17.12%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
NMR
17.12%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

TW

Financial Services industry group

39.86%

Max
62.84%
TW
39.86%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 43.30% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

24.36%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
NMR
24.36%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

TW

Financial Services industry group

43.30%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
TW
43.30%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
ROE (TTM)11.51%14.46%
ROA (TTM)0.68%12.57%
Net Margin (TTM)17.12%39.86%
Operating Margin (TTM)24.36%43.30%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 18.92% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 62.23% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for TW.

Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.80%18.92%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)17.17%19.97%
EPS Growth (YoY)7.17%62.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)58.75%36.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Tradeweb Markets (TW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Tradeweb Markets (TW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 0.42% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

620.40%

NMR
620.40%
Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TW

Financial Services industry group

0.42%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
TW
0.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 12.68% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

16.85%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
NMR
16.85%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TW

Financial Services industry group

12.68%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
TW
12.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
Dividend Yield (TTM)620.40%0.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.85%12.68%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 29.98 sits in the richer quartile — TW needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

10.83

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
NMR
10.83
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

TW

Financial Services industry group

29.98

Max
45.85
TW
29.98
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 12.10 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

0.01

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
NMR
0.01
Min
-0.55

TW

Financial Services industry group

12.10

TW
12.10
Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 4.03 carries an above-peer premium to book — TW is pricier on assets.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

1.15

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
NMR
1.15
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

TW

Financial Services industry group

4.03

Max
7.79
TW
4.03
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. Tradeweb Markets (TW): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Nomura (NMR) and Tradeweb Markets (TW)
MetricNMRTW
P/E Ratio (TTM)10.8329.98
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.0112.10
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.154.03
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----