NMR vs. TPG: Nomura vs. TPG Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and TPG (TPG) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though NMR is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while TPG falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Nomura (NMR) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 17, 2001, whereas TPG (TPG) listed on January 13, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

TPG (TPG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% and TPG (TPG) at 19.19% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% and TPG (TPG) at 5.78% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and TPG (TPG) at 16.57% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

TPG (TPG) at 27.03% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TPG.

Only one side can be read here: Nomura (NMR) reports EPS growth of 7.17%, ranked against its industry; TPG (TPG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and TPG (TPG) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and TPG (TPG) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

TPG (TPG) at 5.01% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

TPG (TPG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 254.55%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while TPG (TPG) at 52.84 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for TPG’s trailing earnings.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while TPG (TPG) at 3.85 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while TPG (TPG) at 5.97 carries an above-peer premium to book — TPG is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics