NMR vs. SF: Nomura vs. Stifel Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and Stifel Financial (SF) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Stifel Financial (SF) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% and Stifel Financial (SF) at 16.55% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% and Stifel Financial (SF) at 16.73% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and Stifel Financial (SF) at 22.49% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and Stifel Financial (SF) at 11.33% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% and Stifel Financial (SF) at -6.08% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Stifel Financial (SF) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Stifel Financial (SF) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Stifel Financial (SF) at 1.83% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% and Stifel Financial (SF) at 22.98% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 and Stifel Financial (SF) at 12.37 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Stifel Financial (SF) at 1.82 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 and Stifel Financial (SF) at 2.00 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics