NMR vs. OWL: Nomura vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though NMR is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while OWL falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Nomura (NMR) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 17, 2001, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) is heavily traded at around 19.50M shares per day, whereas Nomura (NMR) sees a more moderate 789.26K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.08% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for OWL’s trailing earnings.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

On P/B ratio, both Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics