NLY vs. NMR: Annaly Capital Management vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) and Nomura (NMR) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but NLY is classified in Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) while NMR is classified in Capital Markets.

Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR, while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) is a REIT — NMR carries FX, depositary-fee, and withholding-tax nuances, and NLY is best read against FFO rather than standard earnings multiples.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) is heavily traded at around 10.28M shares per day, whereas Nomura (NMR) sees a more moderate 789.26K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 7.35% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.27% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 107.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 24.36%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 87.29% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Nomura (NMR) at 10.80%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.25% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NLY.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 15.38% and Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) reports payout ratio above 100% at 201.39%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 13.02 and Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 10.62 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

On P/B ratio, both Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 1.05 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics