MUFG vs. NWG: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial vs. NatWest Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) and NatWest (NWG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Both Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) and NatWest (NWG) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

NatWest (NWG) at 14.58% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.46% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

NatWest (NWG) at 36.93% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 27.45%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks and NatWest (NWG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.98% and NatWest (NWG) at 13.35% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 33.15% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while NatWest (NWG) at 26.93% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MUFG.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks and NatWest (NWG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks and NatWest (NWG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

NatWest (NWG) at 2.19% pays an industry-typical yield; Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 406.81% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 34.74% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while NatWest (NWG) at 47.43% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

NatWest (NWG) at 7.84 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 13.71 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NWG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks and NatWest (NWG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

NatWest (NWG) at 1.20 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 1.64 carries an above-peer premium to book — MUFG is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics