MTD vs. TEM: Mettler-Toledo vs. Tempus AI Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Mettler-Toledo (MTD) and Tempus AI (TEM) are both classified in the Life Sciences Tools & Services sub-industry within the broader Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Mettler-Toledo (MTD) carries decades of public-market history since November 14, 1997, while Tempus AI (TEM) listed on June 14, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the MTD side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Tempus AI (TEM) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.34, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Mettler-Toledo (MTD) is closer to market-like at 1.15 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Mettler-Toledo (MTD) has no ROE value reported for this period; Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative figure of -37.55%, which needs context because negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative net margin of -12.54%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Mettler-Toledo (MTD) reports 22.25%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative operating margin of -13.82%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Mettler-Toledo (MTD) reports 28.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Tempus AI (TEM) at 83.41% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Mettler-Toledo (MTD) at 3.98% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TEM.

Only one side can be read here: Mettler-Toledo (MTD) reports EPS growth of 3.88%, ranked against its industry; Tempus AI (TEM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Mettler-Toledo (MTD) at 1.10 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MTD.

Debt sits unusually high against shareholders’ equity for both Mettler-Toledo (MTD) at 26.06 and Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.86 — each debt-to-equity ratio is above its industry benchmark range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Mettler-Toledo (MTD) nor Tempus AI (TEM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Mettler-Toledo (MTD) nor Tempus AI (TEM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Mettler-Toledo (MTD) trades at 37.38 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Tempus AI (TEM) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Mettler-Toledo (MTD) at 8.16 and Tempus AI (TEM) at 9.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Measured against book value, both Mettler-Toledo (MTD) at 442.71 and Tempus AI (TEM) at 27.66 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics