LLY vs. TEM: Eli Lilly vs. Tempus AI Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Eli Lilly (LLY) and Tempus AI (TEM) both fall under the Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences industry group, but LLY is classified in Pharmaceuticals while TEM is classified in Life Sciences Tools & Services.

Eli Lilly (LLY) carries decades of public-market history since June 1, 1972, while Tempus AI (TEM) listed on June 14, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the LLY side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Tempus AI (TEM) has a highly aggressive beta of 3.34, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Eli Lilly (LLY) is defensive at 0.40 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative ROE of -37.55%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Eli Lilly (LLY) reports 86.02%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative net margin of -12.54%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Eli Lilly (LLY) reports 31.90%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative operating margin of -13.82%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Eli Lilly (LLY) reports 53.66%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Tempus AI (TEM) at 83.41% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Eli Lilly (LLY) at 44.70% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TEM.

Only one side can be read here: Eli Lilly (LLY) reports EPS growth of 95.99%, ranked against its industry; Tempus AI (TEM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Eli Lilly (LLY) at 1.39 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LLY.

Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but TEM is more stretched: Eli Lilly (LLY) at 1.23 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.86 is above its industry benchmark range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Tempus AI (TEM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Eli Lilly (LLY) reports a yield of 0.49%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Eli Lilly (LLY) reports a payout of 21.71%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Eli Lilly (LLY) trades at 43.95 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Tempus AI (TEM) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Eli Lilly (LLY) at 13.95 and Tempus AI (TEM) at 9.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Measured against book value, both Eli Lilly (LLY) at 29.96 and Tempus AI (TEM) at 27.66 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics