MTB vs. NU: M&T Bank vs. Nu Holdings Stock Comparison

Company Profile

M&T Bank (MTB) and Nu Holdings (NU) both belong to the Banks industry, though MTB is classified under Regional Banks while NU falls under Diversified Banks.

M&T Bank (MTB) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Nu Holdings (NU) listed on December 9, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Nu Holdings (NU) is heavily traded at around 80.53M shares per day, whereas M&T Bank (MTB) sees a more moderate 979.16K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Nu Holdings (NU) at 31.63% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than M&T Bank (MTB) at 10.60%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Nu Holdings (NU) at 42.73% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.87%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Nu Holdings (NU) at 28.51% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 4.34% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Nu Holdings (NU) at 44.92% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 16.12% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NU.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Nu Holdings (NU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile M&T Bank (MTB) reports a yield of 2.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Nu Holdings (NU) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile M&T Bank (MTB) reports a payout of 31.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

M&T Bank (MTB) at 11.38 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Nu Holdings (NU) at 16.48 sits in the richer quartile — NU needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Nu Holdings (NU) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

M&T Bank (MTB) at 1.24 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Nu Holdings (NU) at 4.39 prices above its benchmark range — NU looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics