MT vs. RPM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 29, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MT and RPM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MT trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with access to a foreign company, while RPM is a standard domestic stock.

Symbol	MT	RPM
Company Name	ArcelorMittal S.A.	RPM International Inc.
Country	Luxembourg	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Chemicals
Market Capitalization	25.50 billion USD	16.15 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	August 7, 1997	March 17, 1980
Security Type	NY Reg Shrs	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MT and RPM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MT vs. RPM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MT	RPM
5-Day Price Return	-1.33%	1.25%
13-Week Price Return	6.22%	9.03%
26-Week Price Return	6.73%	3.88%
52-Week Price Return	36.37%	9.06%
Month-to-Date Return	4.91%	7.22%
Year-to-Date Return	28.71%	2.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.41M	0.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.72M	0.80M
3-Month Volatility	29.01%	28.19%
Beta	1.34	1.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MT

4.80%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 31.09%
Q3: 16.14%
Median: 7.01%
Q1: 1.15%
Min: -19.85%

MT’s Return on Equity of 4.80% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RPM

25.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 26.17%
Q3: 13.48%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 2.52%
Min: -11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, RPM’s Return on Equity of 25.21% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MT

4.11%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 40.97%
Q3: 17.87%
Median: 7.03%
Q1: 1.82%
Min: -20.01%

MT’s Net Profit Margin of 4.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RPM

9.34%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 21.80%
Q3: 9.57%
Median: 4.44%
Q1: 1.14%
Min: -11.30%

RPM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.34% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MT

6.59%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 59.48%
Q3: 26.06%
Median: 10.50%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -21.46%

MT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.59% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RPM

11.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 27.33%
Q3: 13.97%
Median: 8.08%
Q1: 4.46%
Min: -8.10%

RPM’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.71% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MT	RPM
Return on Equity (TTM)	4.80%	25.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.68%	9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.11%	9.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	6.59%	11.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	-81.21%	41.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MT

1.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 4.81
Q3: 2.86
Median: 1.94
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.13

MT’s Current Ratio of 1.40 falls into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RPM

2.16

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.38
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.73
Q1: 1.39
Min: 0.55

RPM’s Current Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MT

0.25

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 1.11
Q3: 0.52
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

MT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RPM

0.92

Chemicals Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.94
Median: 0.65
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

RPM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.92 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MT

5.88

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 65.47
Q3: 29.91
Median: 5.88
Q1: 0.91
Min: -26.49

MT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RPM

12.22

Chemicals Industry

Max: 56.43
Q3: 26.33
Median: 9.38
Q1: 3.10
Min: -9.39

RPM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MT	RPM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.40	2.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.44	1.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.25	0.92
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.88	12.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

MT vs. RPM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MT vs. RPM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MT

1.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 9.36%
Q3: 3.78%
Median: 1.41%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MT’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RPM

1.59%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 6.56%
Q3: 4.04%
Median: 2.47%
Q1: 1.45%
Min: 0.00%

RPM’s Dividend Yield of 1.59% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MT

11.71%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 138.08%
Q3: 63.28%
Median: 38.78%
Q1: 12.84%
Min: 0.00%

MT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.71% is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RPM

37.11%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 181.25%
Q3: 95.01%
Median: 53.52%
Q1: 26.59%
Min: 0.00%

RPM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.11% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MT	RPM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.41%	1.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	11.71%	37.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MT

11.47

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 57.44
Q3: 32.87
Median: 18.04
Q1: 9.84
Min: 0.00

MT’s P/E Ratio of 11.47 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RPM

23.38

Chemicals Industry

Max: 42.94
Q3: 29.77
Median: 20.37
Q1: 14.27
Min: 6.19

RPM’s P/E Ratio of 23.38 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MT

0.47

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 6.52
Q3: 3.19
Median: 1.97
Q1: 0.59
Min: 0.14

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, MT’s P/S Ratio of 0.47 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RPM

2.18

Chemicals Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.16

RPM’s P/S Ratio of 2.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MT

0.49

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 3.92
Q3: 2.15
Median: 1.40
Q1: 0.84
Min: 0.25

MT’s P/B Ratio of 0.49 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RPM

5.01

Chemicals Industry

Max: 4.92
Q3: 2.56
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.97
Min: 0.30

At 5.01, RPM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MT vs. RPM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MT	RPM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.47	23.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.47	2.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.49	5.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	13.03	29.92