MT vs. RGLD: ArcelorMittal vs. Royal Gold Stock Comparison
How do ArcelorMittal (MT) and Royal Gold (RGLD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ArcelorMittal (MT) and Royal Gold (RGLD) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though MT is classified under Steel while RGLD falls under Gold.
Royal Gold (RGLD) trades as ordinary local shares, while ArcelorMittal (MT) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares | Royal Gold, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Luxembourg | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 45.85 billion USD | 22.47 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | August 7, 1997 | June 9, 1981 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 65.49% | 60.60% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 45.03% | 39.65% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.55% | 23.26% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
ArcelorMittal (MT) has an aggressive beta of 1.49, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Royal Gold (RGLD) is defensive at 0.39 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 44.08% | 41.91% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 0.39 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.99% | -40.73% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.35M | 667.01K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.39 | 1.34 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.23 | 2.00 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83% and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 15.03% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MT
Materials industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MT
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
RGLD
Materials industry group
15.03%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RGLD
- 15.03%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 47.99% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
MT
Materials industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- MT
- 1.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RGLD
Materials industry group
47.99%
- RGLD
- 47.99%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 65.85% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
MT
Materials industry group
6.16%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- MT
- 6.16%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RGLD
Materials industry group
65.85%
- Max
- 66.70%
- RGLD
- 65.85%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 1.83% | 15.03% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.31% | 9.97% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.64% | 47.99% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 6.16% | 65.85% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.16% | 86.63% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 43.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 143.20% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Royal Gold (RGLD) at 32.74% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MT.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.74% | 43.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.41% | 19.54% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 143.20% | 32.74% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -26.09% | 22.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 2.40 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MT.
MT
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- MT
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
RGLD
Materials industry group
2.40
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- RGLD
- 2.40
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 0.02 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
MT
Materials industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- MT
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RGLD
Materials industry group
0.02
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- RGLD
- 0.02
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 2.40 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.24 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | -0.03 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 0.74% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
MT
Materials industry group
0.99%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MT
- 0.99%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RGLD
Materials industry group
0.74%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- RGLD
- 0.74%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 19.41% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
MT
Materials industry group
52.92%
- Max
- 83.62%
- MT
- 52.92%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RGLD
Materials industry group
19.41%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- RGLD
- 19.41%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.74% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 52.92% | 19.41% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 27.15 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — MT needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
MT
Materials industry group
44.51
- Max
- 59.00
- MT
- 44.51
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RGLD
Materials industry group
27.15
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- RGLD
- 27.15
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Royal Gold (RGLD) at 12.86 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.
MT
Materials industry group
0.72
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- MT
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.00
RGLD
Materials industry group
12.86
- RGLD
- 12.86
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 2.91 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
MT
Materials industry group
1.70
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- MT
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RGLD
Materials industry group
2.91
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- RGLD
- 2.91
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MT | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 44.51 | 27.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.72 | 12.86 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.70 | 2.91 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -1.75% | 4.24% |