MT vs. PAAS: ArcelorMittal vs. Pan American Silver Stock Comparison
How do ArcelorMittal (MT) and Pan American Silver (PAAS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ArcelorMittal (MT) and Pan American Silver (PAAS) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though MT is classified under Steel while PAAS falls under Silver.
Pan American Silver (PAAS) trades as ordinary local shares, while ArcelorMittal (MT) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares | Pan American Silver Corp. |
| Country/Region | Luxembourg | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Silver |
| Market Capitalization | 45.85 billion USD | 16.98 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | August 7, 1997 | June 12, 1995 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 65.49% | 22.43% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 45.03% | 47.84% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.55% | 11.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 44.08% | 58.13% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 0.72 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.99% | -57.39% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.35M | 4.31M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.39 | 0.31 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.23 | 0.45 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 22.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PAAS.
MT
Materials industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MT
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
PAAS
Materials industry group
22.39%
- Max
- 52.88%
- PAAS
- 22.39%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 35.16% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
MT
Materials industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- MT
- 1.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
PAAS
Materials industry group
35.16%
- Max
- 38.66%
- PAAS
- 35.16%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 34.29% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
MT
Materials industry group
6.16%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- MT
- 6.16%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
PAAS
Materials industry group
34.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- PAAS
- 34.29%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 1.83% | 22.39% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.31% | 11.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.64% | 35.16% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 6.16% | 34.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.16% | 55.17% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 28.38% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 725.81% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; ArcelorMittal (MT) at 143.20% also sits in the top quartile.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.74% | 28.38% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.41% | 34.28% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 143.20% | 725.81% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -26.09% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 2.72 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MT.
MT
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- MT
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
PAAS
Materials industry group
2.72
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- PAAS
- 2.72
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 0.11 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
MT
Materials industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- MT
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
PAAS
Materials industry group
0.11
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- PAAS
- 0.11
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 2.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.24 | 0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | -0.39 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% and Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 1.69% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
MT
Materials industry group
0.99%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MT
- 0.99%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PAAS
Materials industry group
1.69%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- PAAS
- 1.69%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 18.00% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
MT
Materials industry group
52.92%
- Max
- 83.62%
- MT
- 52.92%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PAAS
Materials industry group
18.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- PAAS
- 18.00%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 1.69% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 52.92% | 18.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 10.83 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
MT
Materials industry group
44.51
- Max
- 59.00
- MT
- 44.51
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
PAAS
Materials industry group
10.83
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- PAAS
- 10.83
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 3.80 prices around its industry’s middle — MT costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
MT
Materials industry group
0.72
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- MT
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.00
PAAS
Materials industry group
3.80
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- PAAS
- 3.80
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 and Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 2.29 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
MT
Materials industry group
1.70
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- MT
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
PAAS
Materials industry group
2.29
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- PAAS
- 2.29
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MT | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 44.51 | 10.83 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.72 | 3.80 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.70 | 2.29 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -1.75% | 8.01% |