Seek Returns logo

MPC vs. TRGP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MPC and TRGP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMPCTRGP
Company NameMarathon Petroleum CorporationTarga Resources Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization54.08 billion USD35.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 24, 2011December 7, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MPC and TRGP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MPC vs. TRGP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMPCTRGP
5-Day Price Return7.85%1.89%
13-Week Price Return9.59%2.30%
26-Week Price Return15.71%-17.56%
52-Week Price Return2.71%13.54%
Month-to-Date Return4.52%-0.75%
Year-to-Date Return27.52%-7.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.79M1.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.31M1.79M
3-Month Volatility24.44%25.77%
Beta0.901.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MPC

13.09%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

MPC’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRGP

64.20%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

TRGP’s Return on Equity of 64.20% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MPC

1.58%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, MPC’s Net Profit Margin of 1.58% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TRGP

9.59%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

TRGP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MPC

3.99%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

MPC’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.99% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TRGP

17.60%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

TRGP’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.60% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMPCTRGP
Return on Equity (TTM)13.09%64.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%7.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.58%9.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.99%17.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)9.41%35.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MPC

1.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

MPC’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRGP

0.69

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

TRGP’s Current Ratio of 0.69 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MPC

1.89

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

MPC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TRGP

6.51

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.51, TRGP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MPC

8.08

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

MPC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRGP

3.56

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

TRGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMPCTRGP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.190.69
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.730.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.896.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.083.56

Growth

Revenue Growth

MPC vs. TRGP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MPC vs. TRGP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MPC

2.26%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

MPC’s Dividend Yield of 2.26% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TRGP

2.07%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

TRGP’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MPC

38.21%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MPC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.21% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRGP

43.77%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

TRGP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.77% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMPCTRGP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.26%2.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.21%43.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MPC

23.41

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 23.41 places MPC in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRGP

21.12

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

TRGP’s P/E Ratio of 21.12 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MPC

0.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, MPC’s P/S Ratio of 0.37 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TRGP

2.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

TRGP’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MPC

2.77

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

MPC’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TRGP

14.59

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 14.59, TRGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MPC vs. TRGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMPCTRGP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.4121.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.372.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.7714.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.4337.30