MOG.B vs. PWR: Moog vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do Moog (MOG.B) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Moog (MOG.B) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MOG.B is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Moog Inc. Class B Common Stock | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 10.30 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 51.82% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 37.88% | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.49% | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Quanta Services (PWR) trades around 1.19M shares per day on average, while Moog (MOG.B) sees only 214 — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 43.76% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.76% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 214 | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.09 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.71 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 18.11% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
18.11%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- MOG.B
- 18.11%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 8.73% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
8.73%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- MOG.B
- 8.73%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 14.52% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
14.52%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- MOG.B
- 14.52%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.11% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.04% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.73% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.52% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 28.20% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Moog (MOG.B) at 6.97% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.
EPS Growth
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 14.53% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.97% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.34% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 14.53% | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.92% | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Moog (MOG.B) at 2.09 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PWR.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
2.09
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- MOG.B
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 0.52 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- MOG.B
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.09 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.71 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 0.37% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
0.37%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- MOG.B
- 0.37%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 10.03% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 3.98% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- MOG.B
- 10.03%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.37% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.03% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Moog (MOG.B) at 27.46 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer quartile — PWR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
27.46
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- MOG.B
- 27.46
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Moog (MOG.B) at 2.38 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
2.38
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- MOG.B
- 2.38
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Moog (MOG.B) at 4.63 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 carries an above-peer premium to book — PWR is pricier on assets.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- MOG.B
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 27.46 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.38 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.63 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.24% | 3.78% |