MOG.B vs. PH: Moog vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison
How do Moog (MOG.B) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Moog (MOG.B) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MOG.B is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PH is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Moog Inc. Class B Common Stock | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 10.30 billion USD | 115.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 51.82% | 14.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 37.88% | 33.71% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.49% | 25.35% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 43.76% | 27.33% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.76% | -28.64% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 214 | 627.57K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.09 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.71 | 0.53 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Moog (MOG.B) at 18.11% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
18.11%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- MOG.B
- 18.11%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Moog (MOG.B) at 8.73%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
8.73%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- MOG.B
- 8.73%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Moog (MOG.B) at 14.52%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
14.52%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- MOG.B
- 14.52%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.11% | 24.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.04% | 8.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.73% | 16.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.52% | 21.90% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 28.20% | 37.70% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 6.97% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 14.53% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.97% | 8.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.34% | 4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 14.53% | 5.01% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.92% | 21.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Moog (MOG.B) at 2.09 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PH.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
2.09
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- MOG.B
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 0.52 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- MOG.B
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.09 | 0.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 1.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.71 | 2.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 0.37% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
0.37%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- MOG.B
- 0.37%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 10.03% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- MOG.B
- 10.03%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.37% | 0.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.03% | 26.11% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Moog (MOG.B) at 27.46 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
27.46
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- MOG.B
- 27.46
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Moog (MOG.B) at 2.38 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
2.38
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- MOG.B
- 2.38
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Moog (MOG.B) at 4.63 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.
MOG.B
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- MOG.B
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MOG.B | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 27.46 | 31.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.38 | 5.16 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.63 | 7.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.24% | 2.45% |