Seek Returns

MICC vs. MNST: Magnum Ice Cream vs. Monster Beverage Stock Comparison

How do Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but MICC is classified in Food Products while MNST is classified in Beverages.

Monster Beverage (MNST) has been public since December 9, 1985, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) listed only on December 8, 2025 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Company profile comparison for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
Profile ItemMICCMNST
NameThe Magnum Ice Cream Company N.V.Monster Beverage Corporation
Country/RegionNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupFood, Beverage & TobaccoFood, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS IndustryFood ProductsBeverages
GICS Sub-IndustryPackaged Foods & MeatsSoft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages
Market Capitalization11.74 billion USD89.50 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateDecember 8, 2025December 9, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MICC
MNST
GSPC
Loading price history…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
Total Return (1Y)--29.93%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)--18.04%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)--14.58%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MICC
MNST
GSPC
Loading price history…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.61%26.79%
Beta (5Y)0.530.52
Max Drawdown (5Y)-34.27%-26.03%
Avg. Volume (3M)817.08K9.80M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both MICC and MNST need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)--0.96
Sortino Ratio (1Y)--1.54

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 24.70% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 9.64% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MNST.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.64%

Max
32.02%
Q3
16.61%
Median
10.05%
MICC
9.64%
Q1
4.10%
Min
-10.50%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

24.70%

Max
32.02%
MNST
24.70%
Q3
16.61%
Median
10.05%
Q1
4.10%
Min
-10.50%
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their ROE against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 22.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 2.24%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

2.24%

Max
24.83%
Q3
11.22%
Median
5.94%
MICC
2.24%
Q1
2.05%
Min
-11.49%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

22.66%

Max
24.83%
MNST
22.66%
Q3
11.22%
Median
5.94%
Q1
2.05%
Min
-11.49%
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their net margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 28.06% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 12.49%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

12.49%

Max
34.91%
Q3
17.57%
MICC
12.49%
Median
11.06%
Q1
4.15%
Min
-15.06%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

28.06%

Max
34.91%
MNST
28.06%
Q3
17.57%
Median
11.06%
Q1
4.15%
Min
-15.06%
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their operating margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
ROE (TTM)9.64%24.70%
ROA (TTM)7.26%16.44%
Net Margin (TTM)2.24%22.66%
Operating Margin (TTM)12.49%28.06%
Gross Margin (TTM)36.15%55.27%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at -0.47% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MNST.

Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 19.75% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at -49.24% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.47%10.70%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)1.76%9.54%
EPS Growth (YoY)-49.24%19.75%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-16.73%20.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 3.82 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 1.01 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.01

Max
4.01
Q3
2.35
Median
1.53
Q1
1.02
MICC
1.01
Min
0.33

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.82

Max
4.01
MNST
3.82
Q3
2.35
Median
1.53
Q1
1.02
Min
0.33
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their current ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 3.43 against its industry range, while Monster Beverage (MNST) reports no figure this period.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.43

MICC
3.43
Max
2.19
Q3
1.11
Median
0.68
Q1
0.33
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

--

Max
2.19
Q3
1.11
Median
0.68
Q1
0.33
Min
0.00
MNST
--
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): MNST does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; MICC is benchmarked against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.013.82
Debt / Equity (MRQ)3.43--
Net Debt / EBITDA2.82-1.25

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Neither Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) nor Monster Beverage (MNST) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
9.38%
Q3
3.77%
Median
1.76%
MICC
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
9.38%
Q3
3.77%
Median
1.76%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Neither Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) nor Monster Beverage (MNST) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
199.19%
Q3
81.03%
Median
41.52%
MICC
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
199.19%
Q3
81.03%
Median
41.52%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 39.67 and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 41.56 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

39.67

Max
52.52
MICC
39.67
Q3
30.78
Median
18.76
Q1
12.77
Min
4.72

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

41.56

Max
52.52
MNST
41.56
Q3
30.78
Median
18.76
Q1
12.77
Min
4.72
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 1.45 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.34 clears its benchmark range — MNST looks notably rich on sales.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.45

Max
4.64
Q3
2.27
MICC
1.45
Median
1.17
Q1
0.52
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.34

MNST
9.34
Max
4.64
Q3
2.27
Median
1.17
Q1
0.52
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 9.80 and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.09 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

MICC

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.80

MICC
9.80
Max
6.35
Q3
3.07
Median
1.58
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.09

MNST
9.09
Max
6.35
Q3
3.07
Median
1.58
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricMICCMNST
P/E Ratio (TTM)39.6741.56
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.459.34
P/B Ratio (MRQ)9.809.09
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.38%--