MCO vs. OWL: Moody's vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Moody's (MCO) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though MCO is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while OWL falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Moody's (MCO) has more than two decades of public-market history since October 31, 1994, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) is heavily traded at around 19.50M shares per day, whereas Moody's (MCO) sees a more moderate 817.57K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Moody's (MCO) at 76.74% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Moody's (MCO) at 35.26% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.08% keeps a bottom-quartile share.

Both Moody's (MCO) at 46.27% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Moody's (MCO) at 8.89% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Moody's (MCO) at 21.40% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Moody's (MCO) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Moody's (MCO) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Moody's (MCO) at 0.78% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, OWL the richer one.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Moody's (MCO) reports 24.59%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Moody's (MCO) at 30.85 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 is richer still, above its industry range.

Both look expensive on sales: Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Moody's (MCO) at 10.66 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Moody's (MCO) at 26.68 prices above its benchmark range — MCO looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics