Seek Returns

MCK vs. PHG: McKesson vs. Koninklijke Philips Stock Comparison

How do McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but MCK is classified in Health Care Providers & Services while PHG is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies.

McKesson (MCK) trades as ordinary local shares, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
Profile ItemMCKPHG
NameMcKesson CorporationKoninklijke Philips N.V. ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS Industry GroupHealth Care Equipment & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryHealth Care DistributorsHealth Care Equipment
Market Capitalization122.48 billion USD29.67 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 10, 1994March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MCK
PHG
GSPC
Loading price history…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
Total Return (1Y)25.40%13.15%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)32.67%18.95%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)37.84%-6.38%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MCK
PHG
GSPC
Loading price history…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)31.71%29.55%
Beta (5Y)0.260.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-27.17%-74.51%
Avg. Volume (3M)822.69K1.08M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
MCK and PHG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.670.30
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.150.48

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) earns 8.61% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; McKesson (MCK) has no ROE this period.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
MCK
--

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

8.61%

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
PHG
8.61%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): MCK does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; PHG is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both McKesson (MCK) at 1.12% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 5.39% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.12%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
Median
2.18%
MCK
1.12%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

5.39%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
PHG
5.39%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their net margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both McKesson (MCK) at 1.48% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 3.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.48%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
MCK
1.48%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

3.76%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
PHG
3.76%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
ROE (TTM)--8.61%
ROA (TTM)4.72%3.59%
Net Margin (TTM)1.12%5.39%
Operating Margin (TTM)1.48%3.76%
Gross Margin (TTM)3.65%46.43%

Growth

Revenue Growth

McKesson (MCK) at 12.36% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at -1.04% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: McKesson (MCK) reports EPS growth of 49.22%, ranked against its industry; Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
Revenue Growth (YoY)12.36%-1.04%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)13.39%0.01%
EPS Growth (YoY)49.22%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)15.31%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both McKesson (MCK) at 0.90 and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.33 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.90

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
MCK
0.90
Min
0.30

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.33

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
PHG
1.33
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.70 against its industry range, while McKesson (MCK) reports no figure this period.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
MCK
--

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.70

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
PHG
0.70
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): MCK does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; PHG is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.901.33
Debt / Equity (MRQ)--0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA0.642.45

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile McKesson (MCK) reports a yield of 0.32%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.32%

MCK
0.32%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

PHG
0.00%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 211.79%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile McKesson (MCK) reports 8.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

8.77%

MCK
8.77%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

211.79%

PHG
211.79%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.77%211.79%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

McKesson (MCK) at 27.36 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 63.23 sits in the richer quartile — PHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

27.36

Max
80.41
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
MCK
27.36
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

63.23

Max
80.41
PHG
63.23
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

McKesson (MCK) at 0.29 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.67 prices around its industry’s middle — MCK costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.29

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
Q1
1.10
MCK
0.29
Min
0.03

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.67

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
PHG
1.67
Q1
1.10
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

McKesson (MCK) reports a negative P/B ratio of -30.85, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports 2.28, ranking against industry peers normally.

MCK

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

-30.85

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
MCK
-30.85

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.28

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
PHG
2.28
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
Loading chart…
McKesson (MCK) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for McKesson (MCK) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricMCKPHG
P/E Ratio (TTM)27.3663.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.291.67
P/B Ratio (MRQ)-30.852.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)6.04%6.23%