Seek Returns

MAS vs. PH: Masco vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

How do Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MAS is classified in Building Products while PH is classified in Machinery.

Company profile comparison for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile ItemMASPH
NameMasco CorporationParker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryBuilding ProductsIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization15.85 billion USD115.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MAS
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
Total Return (1Y)40.92%14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)17.66%33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)7.57%25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MAS
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)36.68%27.33%
Beta (5Y)1.191.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)-37.95%-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.20M627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
MAS and PH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.000.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.600.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Parker-Hannifin (PH) earns 24.95% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Masco (MAS) has no ROE this period.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

--

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
MAS
--

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max
40.55%
PH
24.95%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): MAS does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; PH is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Masco (MAS) at 12.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

12.08%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
MAS
12.08%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max
27.47%
PH
16.62%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Masco (MAS) at 17.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.24%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
MAS
17.24%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max
36.60%
PH
21.90%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
ROE (TTM)--24.95%
ROA (TTM)15.25%8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)12.08%16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)17.24%21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)36.61%37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Masco (MAS) at -3.40% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Masco (MAS) at 2.66% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
Revenue Growth (YoY)-3.40%8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-4.49%4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)2.66%5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)2.07%21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Masco (MAS) at 1.83 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PH.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.83

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
MAS
1.83
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
PH
0.94
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Parker-Hannifin (PH) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.09 against its industry range, while Masco (MAS) reports no figure this period.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

--

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
MAS
--

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
PH
1.09
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): MAS does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; PH is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.830.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)--1.09
Net Debt / EBITDA1.982.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 1.52% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MAS the richer one.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.52%

Max
2.66%
MAS
1.52%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
PH
0.85%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Masco (MAS) at 27.55% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

27.55%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
MAS
27.55%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
PH
26.11%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.52%0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.55%26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 17.84 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MAS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.84

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
MAS
17.84
Min
3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
PH
31.53
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 2.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

2.07

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
MAS
2.07
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max
7.54
PH
5.16
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Masco (MAS) reports a negative P/B ratio of -35.38, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports 7.25, ranking against industry peers normally.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

-35.38

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
MAS
-35.38

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max
9.66
PH
7.25
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Masco (MAS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Masco (MAS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricMASPH
P/E Ratio (TTM)17.8431.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.075.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)-35.387.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)5.15%2.45%