MAS vs. NOC: Masco vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MAS is classified in Building Products while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Company profile comparison for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Profile Item	MAS	NOC
Name	Masco Corporation	Northrop Grumman Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Building Products	Aerospace & Defense
GICS Sub-Industry	Building Products	Aerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization	15.85 billion USD	74.59 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	December 31, 1981
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MAS

NOC

GSPC

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
Total Return (1Y)	40.92%	-3.34%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	17.66%	7.23%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	7.57%	9.98%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MAS

NOC

GSPC

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Masco (MAS) has a non-negative beta of 1.19.

Risk profile metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	36.68%	28.86%
Beta (5Y)	1.19	-0.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-37.95%	-37.80%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.20M	902.47K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

MAS and NOC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.00	-0.26
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.60	-0.37

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Northrop Grumman (NOC) earns 26.07% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Masco (MAS) has no ROE this period.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%
MAS: --

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

26.07%

Max: 40.55%
NOC: 26.07%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): MAS does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; NOC is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Masco (MAS) at 12.08% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

12.08%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
MAS: 12.08%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

10.37%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
NOC: 10.37%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Masco (MAS) at 17.24% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.24%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
MAS: 17.24%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

12.91%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
NOC: 12.91%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
ROE (TTM)	--	26.07%
ROA (TTM)	15.25%	7.11%
Net Margin (TTM)	12.08%	10.37%
Operating Margin (TTM)	17.24%	12.91%
Gross Margin (TTM)	36.61%	20.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Masco (MAS) at -3.40% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Masco (MAS) at 2.66% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-3.40%	2.24%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-4.49%	4.65%
EPS Growth (YoY)	2.66%	2.61%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	2.07%	-2.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Masco (MAS) at 1.83 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for NOC.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.83

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
MAS: 1.83
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

1.23

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
NOC: 1.23
Min: 0.36

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Northrop Grumman (NOC) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.93 against its industry range, while Masco (MAS) reports no figure this period.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00
MAS: --

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

0.93

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
NOC: 0.93
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): MAS does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; NOC is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.83	1.23
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	--	0.93
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.98	1.87

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Masco (MAS) at 1.52% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.52%

Max: 2.66%
MAS: 1.52%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

1.82%

Max: 2.66%
NOC: 1.82%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 27.55% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

27.55%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
MAS: 27.55%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

30.18%

Max: 67.39%
NOC: 30.18%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.52%	1.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	27.55%	30.18%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Masco (MAS) at 17.84 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.84

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
MAS: 17.84
Min: 3.03

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

16.57

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
NOC: 16.57
Min: 3.03

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Masco (MAS) at 2.07 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

2.07

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
MAS: 2.07
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

1.71

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
NOC: 1.71
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Masco (MAS) reports a negative P/B ratio of -35.38, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports 3.99, ranking against industry peers normally.

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

-35.38

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08
MAS: -35.38

NOC

Capital Goods industry group

3.99

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
NOC: 3.99
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Masco (MAS) vs. Northrop Grumman (NOC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Masco (MAS) and Northrop Grumman (NOC)
Metric	MAS	NOC
P/E Ratio (TTM)	17.84	16.57
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.07	1.71
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	-35.38	3.99
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	5.15%	4.21%