MAIR vs. VRT: Madison Air vs. Vertiv Stock Comparison
How do Madison Air (MAIR) and Vertiv (VRT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Madison Air (MAIR) and Vertiv (VRT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MAIR is classified in Building Products while VRT is classified in Electrical Equipment.
Vertiv (VRT) has been public since August 2, 2018 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Madison Air (MAIR) only listed on April 16, 2026 — long-window metrics on the MAIR side should be interpreted with caution.
| Profile Item | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Madison Air Solutions Corporation Class A Common Stock | Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 11.56 billion USD | 70.41 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 16, 2026 | August 2, 2018 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -- | 11.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | 71.14% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | 49.38% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 57.10% | 71.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 2.15 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -51.16% | -69.52% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.60M | 5.90M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Both MAIR and VRT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -- | 0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -- | 0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Vertiv (VRT) earns 46.57% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Madison Air (MAIR) has no ROE this period.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
- MAIR
- --
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
46.57%
- VRT
- 46.57%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 16.00% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.73%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
3.73%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- MAIR
- 3.73%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
16.00%
- Max
- 27.47%
- VRT
- 16.00%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Madison Air (MAIR) at 19.76% and Vertiv (VRT) at 23.77% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
19.76%
- Max
- 36.60%
- MAIR
- 19.76%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
23.77%
- Max
- 36.60%
- VRT
- 23.77%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -- | 46.57% |
| ROA (TTM) | -- | 11.94% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.73% | 16.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.76% | 23.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 39.06% | 38.12% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Madison Air (MAIR) at 34.07% and Vertiv (VRT) at 27.69% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Vertiv (VRT) at 166.41% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Madison Air (MAIR) at -2.32%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 34.07% | 27.69% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 21.59% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -2.32% | 166.41% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 340.11% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Madison Air (MAIR) at 1.82 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Vertiv (VRT) at 1.39 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for VRT.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
1.82
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- MAIR
- 1.82
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
1.39
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- VRT
- 1.39
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Madison Air (MAIR) at 0.87 and Vertiv (VRT) at 0.61 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
0.87
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- MAIR
- 0.87
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.61
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- VRT
- 0.61
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.82 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.87 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.37 | -0.11 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Vertiv (VRT) reports a yield of 0.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- MAIR
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- VRT
- 0.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Vertiv (VRT) reports a payout of 4.67%, ranking against industry peers normally.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- MAIR
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
4.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- VRT
- 4.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.11% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 4.67% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 34.18 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Madison Air (MAIR) at 164.57 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for MAIR’s trailing earnings.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
164.57
- MAIR
- 164.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
34.18
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- VRT
- 34.18
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.09 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 5.37 sits in the pricier quartile — VRT costs more per dollar of sales.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
3.09
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- MAIR
- 3.09
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
5.37
- Max
- 7.54
- VRT
- 5.37
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.17 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 12.80 prices above its benchmark range — VRT looks rich relative to book.
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
3.17
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- MAIR
- 3.17
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
12.80
- VRT
- 12.80
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MAIR | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 164.57 | 34.18 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.09 | 5.37 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.17 | 12.80 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | 4.21% |