LTH vs. PSO: Life Time vs. Pearson Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Life Time (LTH) and Pearson (PSO) both fall under the Consumer Services industry group, but LTH is classified in Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure while PSO is classified in Diversified Consumer Services.

Pearson (PSO) has more than two decades of public-market history since November 18, 1996, whereas Life Time (LTH) listed on October 7, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Life Time (LTH) trades as ordinary local shares, while Pearson (PSO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Life Time (LTH) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Pearson (PSO) is defensive at 0.43 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Life Time (LTH) at 13.02% and Pearson (PSO) at 9.16% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Life Time (LTH) at 12.72% and Pearson (PSO) at 8.78% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Life Time (LTH) at 17.34% and Pearson (PSO) at 13.32% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Life Time (LTH) at 14.28% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at 0.70% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Life Time (LTH) at 124.32% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at -20.16% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for LTH.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Life Time (LTH) at 0.73 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pearson (PSO) at 2.00 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both Life Time (LTH) at 1.25 and Pearson (PSO) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Life Time (LTH) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports a yield of 1.46%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Life Time (LTH) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports a payout of 51.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Life Time (LTH) at 25.47 and Pearson (PSO) at 25.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Pearson (PSO) at 2.86 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Life Time (LTH) at 3.21 sits in the pricier quartile — LTH costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Life Time (LTH) at 3.07 and Pearson (PSO) at 2.38 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics