Seek Returns logo

LPLA vs. NMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LPLA and NMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LPLA is a standard domestic listing, while NMR trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLPLANMR
Company NameLPL Financial Holdings Inc.Nomura Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
Market Capitalization26.01 billion USD21.08 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 2010December 17, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LPLA and NMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LPLA vs. NMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLPLANMR
5-Day Price Return3.91%4.84%
13-Week Price Return-14.64%17.14%
26-Week Price Return3.96%19.58%
52-Week Price Return35.94%23.08%
Month-to-Date Return-2.27%0.69%
Year-to-Date Return-0.42%17.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.90M10.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.82M10.61M
3-Month Volatility32.91%23.37%
Beta0.601.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LPLA

32.17%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, LPLA’s Return on Equity of 32.17% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NMR

10.90%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

NMR’s Return on Equity of 10.90% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LPLA

7.91%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, LPLA’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

NMR

8.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s Net Profit Margin of 8.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LPLA

12.86%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

LPLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.86% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NMR

11.32%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

NMR’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.32% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLPLANMR
Return on Equity (TTM)32.17%10.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.89%0.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.91%8.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.86%11.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)98.92%41.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LPLA

3.05

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NMR

0.26

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LPLA

1.44

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

NMR

10.28

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LPLA

6.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

NMR

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLPLANMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.050.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.990.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.4410.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.08--

Growth

Revenue Growth

LPLA vs. NMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LPLA vs. NMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LPLA

0.36%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

LPLA’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NMR

3.53%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Yield of 3.53% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LPLA

8.17%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

LPLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.17% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NMR

66.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.06% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLPLANMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.36%3.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.17%66.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LPLA

22.71

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

LPLA’s P/E Ratio of 22.71 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NMR

8.47

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/E Ratio of 8.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LPLA

1.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, LPLA’s P/S Ratio of 1.80 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

NMR

0.68

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LPLA

5.91

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

LPLA’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NMR

0.87

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

NMR’s P/B Ratio of 0.87 is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LPLA vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLPLANMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.718.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.800.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.910.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)74.903.34