LMT vs. VRT: Lockheed Martin vs. Vertiv Stock Comparison
How do Lockheed Martin (LMT) and Vertiv (VRT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Lockheed Martin (LMT) and Vertiv (VRT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but LMT is classified in Aerospace & Defense while VRT is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 131.00 billion USD | 70.41 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | August 2, 2018 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 31.17% | 11.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 12.79% | 71.14% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.65% | 49.38% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Vertiv (VRT) has a highly aggressive beta of 2.15, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) is defensive at 0.10 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.09% | 71.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.10 | 2.15 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -31.79% | -69.52% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.29M | 5.90M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.86 | 0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.38 | 0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 80.19% and Vertiv (VRT) at 46.57% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
80.19%
- LMT
- 80.19%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
46.57%
- VRT
- 46.57%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 16.00% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 8.23%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
8.23%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LMT
- 8.23%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
16.00%
- Max
- 27.47%
- VRT
- 16.00%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 23.77% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 11.41%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
11.41%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LMT
- 11.41%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
23.77%
- Max
- 36.60%
- VRT
- 23.77%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 80.19% | 46.57% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.58% | 11.94% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.23% | 16.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.41% | 23.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 11.73% | 38.12% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Vertiv (VRT) at 27.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 5.64% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VRT.
EPS Growth
Vertiv (VRT) at 166.41% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Lockheed Martin (LMT) at -3.68%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.64% | 27.69% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.38% | 21.59% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -3.68% | 166.41% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.26% | 340.11% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.26 and Vertiv (VRT) at 1.39 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.26
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LMT
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.36
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
1.39
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- VRT
- 1.39
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Vertiv (VRT) at 0.61 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.04 uses more debt funding than most peers.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.04
- Max
- 2.33
- LMT
- 2.04
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.61
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- VRT
- 0.61
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.26 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.04 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.47 | -0.11 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.40% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Vertiv (VRT) at 0.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LMT the richer one.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.40%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LMT
- 2.40%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- VRT
- 0.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 4.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 49.01% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
49.01%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LMT
- 49.01%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
4.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- VRT
- 4.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.40% | 0.11% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 49.01% | 4.67% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 20.14 and Vertiv (VRT) at 34.18 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
20.14
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LMT
- 20.14
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
34.18
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- VRT
- 34.18
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.66 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 5.37 sits in the pricier quartile — VRT costs more per dollar of sales.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.66
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LMT
- 1.66
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
5.37
- Max
- 7.54
- VRT
- 5.37
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 12.96 and Vertiv (VRT) at 12.80 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
12.96
- LMT
- 12.96
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
12.80
- VRT
- 12.80
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LMT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.14 | 34.18 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.66 | 5.37 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 12.96 | 12.80 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.31% | 4.21% |