LHX vs. PH: L3Harris vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison
How do L3Harris (LHX) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
L3Harris (LHX) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but LHX is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PH is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 48.39 billion USD | 115.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -5.21% | 14.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.68% | 33.71% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.91% | 25.35% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.75% | 27.33% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.16% | -28.64% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.70M | 627.57K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.32 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.45 | 0.53 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while L3Harris (LHX) at 10.03% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- LHX
- 10.03%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 8.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LHX
- 8.76%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 14.34%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
14.34%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LHX
- 14.34%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.03% | 24.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.56% | 8.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.76% | 16.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.34% | 21.90% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.55% | 37.70% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 2.53% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 8.39% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.53% | 8.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.62% | 4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.39% | 5.01% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.82% | 21.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 1.20 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LHX
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 0.52 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- LHX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 0.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 1.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.88 | 2.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 1.92% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LHX the richer one.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.92%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LHX
- 1.92%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while L3Harris (LHX) at 46.09% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
46.09%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LHX
- 46.09%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.92% | 0.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 46.09% | 26.11% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 24.20 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
24.20
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LHX
- 24.20
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.07
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LHX
- 2.07
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.39 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.39
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- LHX
- 2.39
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LHX | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.20 | 31.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.07 | 5.16 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.39 | 7.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.09% | 2.45% |