LHX vs. NOC: L3Harris vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison
How do L3Harris (LHX) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
L3Harris (LHX) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) are both classified in the Aerospace & Defense sub-industry within the broader Aerospace & Defense industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | Northrop Grumman Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 48.39 billion USD | 74.59 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -5.21% | -3.34% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.68% | 7.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.91% | 9.98% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. L3Harris (LHX) has a non-negative beta of 0.46.
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.75% | 28.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | -0.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.16% | -37.80% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.70M | 902.47K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.32 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.45 | -0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% sits in the top ROE quartile, while L3Harris (LHX) at 10.03% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for NOC.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- LHX
- 10.03%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 8.76% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LHX
- 8.76%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 14.34% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
14.34%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LHX
- 14.34%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.03% | 26.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.56% | 7.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.76% | 10.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.34% | 12.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.55% | 20.03% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 2.53% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 8.39% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.53% | 2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.62% | 4.65% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.39% | 2.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.82% | -2.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 1.20 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LHX
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 0.52 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- LHX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.88 | 1.87 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 1.92% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.92%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LHX
- 1.92%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 46.09% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
46.09%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LHX
- 46.09%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.92% | 1.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 46.09% | 30.18% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while L3Harris (LHX) at 24.20 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
24.20
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LHX
- 24.20
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both L3Harris (LHX) at 2.07 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.07
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LHX
- 2.07
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both L3Harris (LHX) at 2.39 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.39
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- LHX
- 2.39
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LHX | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.20 | 16.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.07 | 1.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.39 | 3.99 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.09% | 4.21% |