LDOS vs. TRI: Leidos vs. Thomson Reuters Stock Comparison
How do Leidos (LDOS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Leidos (LDOS) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) are both classified in the Research & Consulting Services sub-industry within the broader Professional Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Leidos Holdings, Inc. | Thomson Reuters Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Commercial & Professional Services | Commercial & Professional Services |
| GICS Industry | Professional Services | Professional Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Research & Consulting Services | Research & Consulting Services |
| Market Capitalization | 16.19 billion USD | 48.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | October 17, 2006 | June 12, 2002 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -30.14% | -16.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.13% | -3.77% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.97% | 0.07% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.87% | 52.25% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.73 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -49.47% | -62.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.21M | 1.62M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.96 | -0.41 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.29 | -0.58 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Leidos (LDOS) at 28.27% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 14.11% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LDOS.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
28.27%
- Max
- 47.06%
- LDOS
- 28.27%
- Q3
- 25.43%
- Median
- 14.11%
- Q1
- 3.92%
- Min
- -20.15%
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
14.11%
- Max
- 47.06%
- Q3
- 25.43%
- TRI
- 14.11%
- Median
- 14.11%
- Q1
- 3.92%
- Min
- -20.15%
Net Margin (TTM)
Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 19.69% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Leidos (LDOS) at 7.97%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
7.97%
- Max
- 23.28%
- Q3
- 11.35%
- LDOS
- 7.97%
- Median
- 5.65%
- Q1
- 0.87%
- Min
- -8.60%
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
19.69%
- Max
- 23.28%
- TRI
- 19.69%
- Q3
- 11.35%
- Median
- 5.65%
- Q1
- 0.87%
- Min
- -8.60%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 21.93% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Leidos (LDOS) at 12.05%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
12.05%
- Max
- 38.50%
- Q3
- 18.84%
- LDOS
- 12.05%
- Median
- 10.40%
- Q1
- 5.59%
- Min
- -12.00%
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
21.93%
- Max
- 38.50%
- TRI
- 21.93%
- Q3
- 18.84%
- Median
- 10.40%
- Q1
- 5.59%
- Min
- -12.00%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 28.27% | 14.11% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.08% | 6.96% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.97% | 19.69% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.05% | 21.93% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 17.63% | 39.72% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Leidos (LDOS) at 3.07% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 3.00% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Leidos (LDOS) at 20.82% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at -31.90% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.07% | 3.00% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.06% | 4.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 20.82% | -31.90% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 30.96% | 3.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Leidos (LDOS) at 1.60 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 1.08 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for TRI.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
1.60
- Max
- 3.63
- Q3
- 2.14
- LDOS
- 1.60
- Median
- 1.55
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.45
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
1.08
- Max
- 3.63
- Q3
- 2.14
- Median
- 1.55
- Q1
- 1.09
- TRI
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.45
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 0.36 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Leidos (LDOS) at 1.26 uses more debt funding than most peers.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
1.26
- Max
- 2.37
- LDOS
- 1.26
- Q3
- 1.25
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
0.36
- Max
- 2.37
- Q3
- 1.25
- Median
- 0.88
- TRI
- 0.36
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.60 | 1.08 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.26 | 0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.46 | 1.17 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 2.18% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Leidos (LDOS) at 1.27% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TRI the richer one.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
1.27%
- Max
- 4.33%
- Q3
- 1.80%
- LDOS
- 1.27%
- Median
- 0.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
2.18%
- Max
- 4.33%
- TRI
- 2.18%
- Q3
- 1.80%
- Median
- 0.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Leidos (LDOS) at 15.37% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 79.09% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
15.37%
- Max
- 99.58%
- Q3
- 41.99%
- Median
- 17.27%
- LDOS
- 15.37%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -17.94%
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
79.09%
- Max
- 99.58%
- TRI
- 79.09%
- Q3
- 41.99%
- Median
- 17.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -17.94%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.27% | 2.18% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 15.37% | 79.09% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Leidos (LDOS) at 11.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 34.53 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
11.86
- Max
- 49.47
- Q3
- 33.76
- Median
- 24.16
- Q1
- 16.01
- LDOS
- 11.86
- Min
- 1.89
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
34.53
- Max
- 49.47
- TRI
- 34.53
- Q3
- 33.76
- Median
- 24.16
- Q1
- 16.01
- Min
- 1.89
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Leidos (LDOS) at 0.91 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 6.09 sits in the pricier quartile — TRI costs more per dollar of sales.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
0.91
- Max
- 7.17
- Q3
- 3.35
- Median
- 1.33
- LDOS
- 0.91
- Q1
- 0.69
- Min
- 0.11
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
6.09
- Max
- 7.17
- TRI
- 6.09
- Q3
- 3.35
- Median
- 1.33
- Q1
- 0.69
- Min
- 0.11
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Leidos (LDOS) at 3.13 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 4.35 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
LDOS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
3.13
- Max
- 11.25
- Q3
- 6.08
- LDOS
- 3.13
- Median
- 2.92
- Q1
- 1.55
- Min
- -2.78
TRI
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
4.35
- Max
- 11.25
- Q3
- 6.08
- TRI
- 4.35
- Median
- 2.92
- Q1
- 1.55
- Min
- -2.78
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LDOS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 11.86 | 34.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 6.09 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.13 | 4.35 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.41% | 2.27% |