KKR vs. NMR: KKR vs. Nomura Stock Comparison
How do KKR (KKR) and Nomura (NMR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
KKR (KKR) and Nomura (NMR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though KKR is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while NMR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.
KKR (KKR) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Korro Bio, Inc. | Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Japan |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Asset Management & Custody Banks | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 89.11 billion USD | 27.53 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 15, 2010 | December 17, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -18.61% | 35.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.09% | 37.86% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.12% | 18.78% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.71% | 29.52% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.69 | 0.79 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -49.42% | -38.40% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.77M | 789.26K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.59 | 1.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.81 | 1.55 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both KKR (KKR) at 7.28% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
7.28%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- KKR
- 7.28%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
11.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- NMR
- 11.51%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both KKR (KKR) at 12.20% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
12.20%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- KKR
- 12.20%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
17.12%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NMR
- 17.12%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both KKR (KKR) at 20.65% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
20.65%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- KKR
- 20.65%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
24.36%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- NMR
- 24.36%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.28% | 11.51% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.39% | 0.68% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.20% | 17.12% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.65% | 24.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while KKR (KKR) at -11.24% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while KKR (KKR) at -28.66% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -11.24% | 10.80% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 51.12% | 17.17% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -28.66% | 7.17% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 58.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: KKR (KKR) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: KKR (KKR) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
KKR (KKR) at 0.77% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
0.77%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- KKR
- 0.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
620.40%
- NMR
- 620.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both KKR (KKR) at 23.96% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
23.96%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- KKR
- 23.96%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
16.85%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NMR
- 16.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.77% | 620.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 23.96% | 16.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while KKR (KKR) at 30.82 sits in the richer quartile — KKR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
30.82
- Max
- 45.85
- KKR
- 30.82
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
NMR
Financial Services industry group
10.83
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NMR
- 10.83
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while KKR (KKR) at 3.45 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
3.45
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- KKR
- 3.45
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
NMR
Financial Services industry group
0.01
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- NMR
- 0.01
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both KKR (KKR) at 3.04 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
KKR
Financial Services industry group
3.04
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- KKR
- 3.04
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
NMR
Financial Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- NMR
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KKR | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.82 | 10.83 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.45 | 0.01 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.04 | 1.15 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |