Seek Returns logo

KEP vs. XEL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KEP and XEL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KEP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, XEL is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolKEPXEL
Company NameKorea Electric Power CorporationXcel Energy Inc.
CountrySouth KoreaUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization16.34 billion USD48.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 27, 1994February 21, 1973
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KEP and XEL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KEP vs. XEL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKEPXEL
5-Day Price Return-1.93%2.83%
13-Week Price Return-1.11%20.65%
26-Week Price Return59.19%13.46%
52-Week Price Return-7.95%29.90%
Month-to-Date Return-1.53%1.49%
Year-to-Date Return77.06%21.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.73M5.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.35M3.94M
3-Month Volatility36.82%19.28%
Beta0.280.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KEP

15.57%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
25.46%
Q3
14.70%
Median
10.64%
Q1
6.99%
Min
0.02%

In the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Return on Equity of 15.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XEL

10.41%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
25.46%
Q3
14.70%
Median
10.64%
Q1
6.99%
Min
0.02%

XEL’s Return on Equity of 10.41% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KEP

6.78%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.56%
Q3
16.54%
Median
11.20%
Q1
7.30%
Min
0.01%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 6.78% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

XEL

14.91%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.56%
Q3
16.54%
Median
11.20%
Q1
7.30%
Min
0.01%

XEL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KEP

12.54%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
38.77%
Q3
25.54%
Median
18.87%
Q1
14.12%
Min
0.02%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.54% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

XEL

18.07%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
38.77%
Q3
25.54%
Median
18.87%
Q1
14.12%
Min
0.02%

XEL’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.07% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKEPXEL
Return on Equity (TTM)15.57%10.41%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.56%2.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.78%14.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.54%18.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-19.73%40.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KEP

0.46

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.23
Median
0.98
Q1
0.72
Min
0.13

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XEL

0.96

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.23
Median
0.98
Q1
0.72
Min
0.13

XEL’s Current Ratio of 0.96 aligns with the median group of the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KEP

3.18

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.90
Median
1.27
Q1
0.62
Min
0.00

KEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XEL

1.54

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.90
Median
1.27
Q1
0.62
Min
0.00

XEL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.54 is typical for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KEP

2.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
9.89
Median
3.33
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.57 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

XEL

2.32

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
9.89
Median
3.33
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, XEL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.32 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKEPXEL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.460.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.290.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.181.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.572.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

KEP vs. XEL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KEP vs. XEL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KEP

1.12%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.61%
Q3
4.66%
Median
3.55%
Q1
2.23%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Yield of 1.12% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

XEL

2.54%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.61%
Q3
4.66%
Median
3.55%
Q1
2.23%
Min
0.00%

XEL’s Dividend Yield of 2.54% is consistent with its peers in the Electric Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KEP

6.37%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
140.33%
Q3
84.46%
Median
60.94%
Q1
31.83%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.37% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

XEL

59.09%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
140.33%
Q3
84.46%
Median
60.94%
Q1
31.83%
Min
0.00%

XEL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.09% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKEPXEL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.12%2.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.37%59.09%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KEP

3.60

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
34.39
Q3
21.23
Median
15.47
Q1
10.17
Min
3.08

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/E Ratio of 3.60 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

XEL

23.29

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
34.39
Q3
21.23
Median
15.47
Q1
10.17
Min
3.08

A P/E Ratio of 23.29 places XEL in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KEP

0.24

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.03
Q3
3.06
Median
1.89
Q1
1.06
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

XEL

3.47

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.03
Q3
3.06
Median
1.89
Q1
1.06
Min
0.00

XEL’s P/S Ratio of 3.47 is in the upper echelon for the Electric Utilities industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KEP

0.59

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.86
Median
1.46
Q1
1.01
Min
0.27

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.59 is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

XEL

1.87

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.86
Median
1.46
Q1
1.01
Min
0.27

XEL’s P/B Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper tier for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KEP vs. XEL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKEPXEL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)3.6023.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.243.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.591.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.7391.27