KEP vs. NEE: Korea Electric Power vs. NextEra Energy Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Korea Electric Power (KEP) and NextEra Energy (NEE) are both classified in the Electric Utilities sub-industry within the broader Electric Utilities industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

NextEra Energy (NEE) trades as ordinary local shares, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

NextEra Energy (NEE) is heavily traded at around 11.90M shares per day, whereas Korea Electric Power (KEP) sees a more moderate 949.70K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 16.60% and NextEra Energy (NEE) at 14.06% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

NextEra Energy (NEE) at 40.37% retains an above-range share of revenue as profit, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 8.04% keeps a bottom-quartile share — a wide gap in how much each sales dollar survives to the bottom line.

NextEra Energy (NEE) at 33.00% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.73% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.31% and NextEra Energy (NEE) at 10.74% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 144.73% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than NextEra Energy (NEE) at -2.63%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.44 and NextEra Energy (NEE) at 0.53 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

NextEra Energy (NEE) at 1.53 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.63 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

NextEra Energy (NEE) at 2.76% pays an industry-typical yield; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 13,891.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

NextEra Energy (NEE) at 43.89% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 12.22% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.66 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while NextEra Energy (NEE) at 15.67 is closer to a normal peer multiple — a clearer earnings-valuation discount for KEP, subject to growth and earnings quality.

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.00 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while NextEra Energy (NEE) at 6.33 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.38 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while NextEra Energy (NEE) at 2.97 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics