KEP vs. PCG: Korea Electric Power vs. PG&E Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Korea Electric Power (KEP) and PG&E (PCG) are both classified in the Electric Utilities sub-industry within the broader Electric Utilities industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

PG&E (PCG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

PG&E (PCG) is heavily traded at around 39.33M shares per day, whereas Korea Electric Power (KEP) sees a more moderate 949.70K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 16.60% sits in the top ROE quartile, while PG&E (PCG) at 8.89% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for KEP.

PG&E (PCG) at 11.57% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 8.04% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

PG&E (PCG) at 23.64% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.73% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while PG&E (PCG) at 2.11% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 144.73% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than PG&E (PCG) at 2.61%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

PG&E (PCG) at 1.03 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.44 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for KEP.

Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.63 and PG&E (PCG) at 1.88 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PG&E (PCG) at 1.51% pays an industry-typical yield; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 13,891.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 12.22% and PG&E (PCG) at 14.81% pay out less of their earnings than their industries typically do, keeping retention high — common for businesses prioritizing reinvestment.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both screen inexpensive on earnings, but Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.66 is the deeper discount: its P/E ratio is below the industry range, while PG&E (PCG) at 9.61 sits in the cheaper quartile.

Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.00 and PG&E (PCG) at 1.11 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Relative to net asset value, both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.38 and PG&E (PCG) at 0.87 look inexpensive, sitting in the lower P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics