KEP vs. LNT: Korea Electric Power vs. Alliant Energy Stock Comparison
How do Korea Electric Power (KEP) and Alliant Energy (LNT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Korea Electric Power (KEP) and Alliant Energy (LNT) are both classified in the Electric Utilities sub-industry within the broader Electric Utilities industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Alliant Energy (LNT) trades as ordinary local shares, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Korea Electric Power Corporation Sponsored ADR | Alliant Energy Corporation |
| Country/Region | South Korea | United States |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Electric Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electric Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 14.38 billion USD | 18.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | October 27, 1994 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -25.98% | 12.31% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 20.85% | 18.55% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.90% | 9.28% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 46.68% | 17.65% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.50 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -55.55% | -25.59% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 949.70K | 2.73M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.65 | 0.46 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.93 | 0.66 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 16.60% and Alliant Energy (LNT) at 12.36% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
KEP
Utilities industry group
16.60%
- Max
- 17.99%
- KEP
- 16.60%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
LNT
Utilities industry group
12.36%
- Max
- 17.99%
- LNT
- 12.36%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Alliant Energy (LNT) at 20.74% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 8.04% keeps a bottom-quartile share.
KEP
Utilities industry group
8.04%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- KEP
- 8.04%
- Min
- -0.20%
LNT
Utilities industry group
20.74%
- Max
- 28.78%
- LNT
- 20.74%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Alliant Energy (LNT) at 30.27% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.73% operates in the bottom quartile.
KEP
Utilities industry group
4.73%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- KEP
- 4.73%
- Min
- -4.90%
LNT
Utilities industry group
30.27%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- LNT
- 30.27%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 16.60% | 12.36% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.04% | 2.47% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.04% | 20.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 4.73% | 30.27% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 15.97% | 45.05% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.31% and Alliant Energy (LNT) at 9.57% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 144.73% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Alliant Energy (LNT) at 16.73%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.31% | 9.57% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.03% | 1.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 144.73% | 16.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 4.77% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.44 and Alliant Energy (LNT) at 0.51 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.44
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- KEP
- 0.44
- Min
- 0.29
LNT
Utilities industry group
0.51
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- LNT
- 0.51
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Alliant Energy (LNT) at 1.61 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.63 uses more debt funding than most peers.
KEP
Utilities industry group
2.63
- KEP
- 2.63
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
LNT
Utilities industry group
1.61
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- LNT
- 1.61
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.44 | 0.51 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.63 | 1.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.13 | 6.67 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Alliant Energy (LNT) at 2.88% pays an industry-typical yield; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 13,891.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
KEP
Utilities industry group
13,891.89%
- KEP
- 13,891.89%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNT
Utilities industry group
2.88%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- LNT
- 2.88%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Alliant Energy (LNT) at 58.84% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 12.22% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.
KEP
Utilities industry group
12.22%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- KEP
- 12.22%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNT
Utilities industry group
58.84%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- LNT
- 58.84%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 13,891.89% | 2.88% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 12.22% | 58.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.66 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while Alliant Energy (LNT) at 20.24 is closer to a normal peer multiple — a clearer earnings-valuation discount for KEP, subject to growth and earnings quality.
KEP
Utilities industry group
2.66
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
- KEP
- 2.66
LNT
Utilities industry group
20.24
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- LNT
- 20.24
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.00 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Alliant Energy (LNT) at 4.18 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.00
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- KEP
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
LNT
Utilities industry group
4.18
- Max
- 6.35
- LNT
- 4.18
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.38 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Alliant Energy (LNT) at 2.41 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.38
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- KEP
- 0.38
- Min
- 0.34
LNT
Utilities industry group
2.41
- Max
- 3.12
- LNT
- 2.41
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KEP | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 2.66 | 20.24 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 4.18 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 0.38 | 2.41 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4,799.31% | -8.11% |