J vs. ULS: Jacobs vs. UL Stock Comparison
How do Jacobs (J) and UL (ULS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Jacobs (J) and UL (ULS) are both classified in the Research & Consulting Services sub-industry within the broader Professional Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Jacobs (J) carries decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, while UL (ULS) listed on April 12, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the J side.
| Profile Item | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Jacobs Solutions Inc. | UL Solutions Inc. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Commercial & Professional Services | Commercial & Professional Services |
| GICS Industry | Professional Services | Professional Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Research & Consulting Services | Research & Consulting Services |
| Market Capitalization | 17.43 billion USD | 15.88 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | April 12, 2024 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.06% | -3.81% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.63% | -- |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.41% | -- |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.18% | 42.88% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.52 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -34.44% | -38.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 878.62K | 879.46K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | -0.19 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.05 | -0.28 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
UL (ULS) at 36.51% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Jacobs (J) at 8.00% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for ULS.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
8.00%
- Max
- 47.06%
- Q3
- 25.43%
- Median
- 14.11%
- J
- 8.00%
- Q1
- 3.92%
- Min
- -20.15%
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
36.51%
- Max
- 47.06%
- ULS
- 36.51%
- Q3
- 25.43%
- Median
- 14.11%
- Q1
- 3.92%
- Min
- -20.15%
Net Margin (TTM)
UL (ULS) at 16.13% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Jacobs (J) at 2.38%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
2.38%
- Max
- 23.28%
- Q3
- 11.35%
- Median
- 5.65%
- J
- 2.38%
- Q1
- 0.87%
- Min
- -8.60%
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
16.13%
- Max
- 23.28%
- ULS
- 16.13%
- Q3
- 11.35%
- Median
- 5.65%
- Q1
- 0.87%
- Min
- -8.60%
Operating Margin (TTM)
UL (ULS) at 19.81% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Jacobs (J) at 7.39%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
7.39%
- Max
- 38.50%
- Q3
- 18.84%
- Median
- 10.40%
- J
- 7.39%
- Q1
- 5.59%
- Min
- -12.00%
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
19.81%
- Max
- 38.50%
- ULS
- 19.81%
- Q3
- 18.84%
- Median
- 10.40%
- Q1
- 5.59%
- Min
- -12.00%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 8.00% | 36.51% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.55% | 11.46% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 2.38% | 16.13% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.39% | 19.81% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 22.07% | 50.69% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Jacobs (J) at 4.60% and UL (ULS) at 6.38% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
UL (ULS) at -1.23% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Jacobs (J) at -62.34% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.60% | 6.38% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.13% | 6.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -62.34% | -1.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -21.82% | 2.98% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Jacobs (J) at 1.29 and UL (ULS) at 2.09 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
1.29
- Max
- 3.63
- Q3
- 2.14
- Median
- 1.55
- J
- 1.29
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.45
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
2.09
- Max
- 3.63
- Q3
- 2.14
- ULS
- 2.09
- Median
- 1.55
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.45
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
UL (ULS) at 0.54 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Jacobs (J) at 1.25 uses more debt funding than most peers.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
1.25
- Max
- 2.37
- J
- 1.25
- Q3
- 1.25
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
0.54
- Max
- 2.37
- Q3
- 1.25
- Median
- 0.88
- ULS
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.29 | 2.09 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.25 | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.72 | -0.11 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Jacobs (J) at 0.92% and UL (ULS) at 0.74% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
0.92%
- Max
- 4.33%
- Q3
- 1.80%
- J
- 0.92%
- Median
- 0.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
0.74%
- Max
- 4.33%
- Q3
- 1.80%
- ULS
- 0.74%
- Median
- 0.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
UL (ULS) at 22.42% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Jacobs (J) at 45.18% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
45.18%
- Max
- 99.58%
- J
- 45.18%
- Q3
- 41.99%
- Median
- 17.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -17.94%
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
22.42%
- Max
- 99.58%
- Q3
- 41.99%
- ULS
- 22.42%
- Median
- 17.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -17.94%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.92% | 0.74% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 45.18% | 22.42% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
UL (ULS) at 31.21 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Jacobs (J) at 49.47 sits in the richer quartile — J needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
49.47
- J
- 49.47
- Max
- 49.47
- Q3
- 33.76
- Median
- 24.16
- Q1
- 16.01
- Min
- 1.89
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
31.21
- Max
- 49.47
- Q3
- 33.76
- ULS
- 31.21
- Median
- 24.16
- Q1
- 16.01
- Min
- 1.89
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Jacobs (J) at 1.23 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while UL (ULS) at 4.98 sits in the pricier quartile — ULS costs more per dollar of sales.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
1.23
- Max
- 7.17
- Q3
- 3.35
- Median
- 1.33
- J
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.69
- Min
- 0.11
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
4.98
- Max
- 7.17
- ULS
- 4.98
- Q3
- 3.35
- Median
- 1.33
- Q1
- 0.69
- Min
- 0.11
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Jacobs (J) at 5.34 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while UL (ULS) at 9.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — ULS is pricier on assets.
J
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
5.34
- Max
- 11.25
- Q3
- 6.08
- J
- 5.34
- Median
- 2.92
- Q1
- 1.55
- Min
- -2.78
ULS
Commercial & Professional Services industry group
9.32
- Max
- 11.25
- ULS
- 9.32
- Q3
- 6.08
- Median
- 2.92
- Q1
- 1.55
- Min
- -2.78
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | J | ULS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 49.47 | 31.21 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.23 | 4.98 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 5.34 | 9.32 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.71% | 2.94% |