ITT vs. PH: ITT vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile Item	ITT	PH
Name	ITT Inc.	Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Machinery	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	18.34 billion USD	115.73 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 15, 1995	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

ITT

GSPC

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
Total Return (1Y)	16.96%	14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	30.67%	33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	17.16%	25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

ITT

GSPC

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	32.39%	27.33%
Beta (5Y)	1.22	1.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-37.97%	-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)	787.73K	627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

ITT and PH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.39	0.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.59	0.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ITT (ITT) at 11.36% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

11.36%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
ITT: 11.36%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max: 40.55%
PH: 24.95%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ITT (ITT) at 8.07%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

8.07%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
ITT: 8.07%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max: 27.47%
PH: 16.62%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ITT (ITT) at 16.49%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

16.49%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
ITT: 16.49%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max: 36.60%
PH: 21.90%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
ROE (TTM)	11.36%	24.95%
ROA (TTM)	6.46%	8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)	8.07%	16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)	16.49%	21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)	35.70%	37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both ITT (ITT) at 8.48% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both ITT (ITT) at -3.02% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
Revenue Growth (YoY)	8.48%	8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	9.65%	4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-3.02%	5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	11.73%	21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both ITT (ITT) at 1.29 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

1.29

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
ITT: 1.29
Min: 0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
PH: 0.94
Min: 0.36

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both ITT (ITT) at 0.76 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

0.76

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
ITT: 0.76
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
PH: 1.09
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	0.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.76	1.09
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.80	2.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both ITT (ITT) at 0.77% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

0.77%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
ITT: 0.77%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
PH: 0.85%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ITT (ITT) at 31.06% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

31.06%

Max: 67.39%
ITT: 31.06%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
PH: 26.11%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.77%	0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	31.06%	26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while ITT (ITT) at 42.29 sits in the richer quartile — ITT needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

42.29

Max: 59.38
ITT: 42.29
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
PH: 31.53
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

ITT (ITT) at 3.54 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

3.54

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
ITT: 3.54
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max: 7.54
PH: 5.16
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

ITT (ITT) at 3.85 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.

ITT

Capital Goods industry group

3.85

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
ITT: 3.85
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max: 9.66
PH: 7.25
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

ITT (ITT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ITT (ITT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	ITT	PH
P/E Ratio (TTM)	42.29	31.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.54	5.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	3.85	7.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.63%	2.45%