IR vs. PWR: Ingersoll Rand vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.
EPS Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PWR.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 3.98% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer quartile — PWR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 carries an above-peer premium to book — PWR is pricier on assets.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 3.78% |