IR vs. LMT: Ingersoll Rand vs. Lockheed Martin Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while LMT is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 131.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | 31.17% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 12.79% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 14.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 31.09% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -31.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 1.29M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | 0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 1.38 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 80.19% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
80.19%
- LMT
- 80.19%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 8.23%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
8.23%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LMT
- 8.23%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 11.41%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
11.41%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LMT
- 11.41%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 80.19% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 8.58% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 8.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 11.41% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 11.73% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 5.64% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at -3.68% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 5.64% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 4.38% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | -3.68% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | -0.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.26 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LMT.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.26
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LMT
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.04 uses more debt funding than most peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.04
- Max
- 2.33
- LMT
- 2.04
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 1.26 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 2.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.47 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.40% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LMT the richer one.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.40%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LMT
- 2.40%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 49.01% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
49.01%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LMT
- 49.01%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 2.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 49.01% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 20.14 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
20.14
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LMT
- 20.14
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.66 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.66
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LMT
- 1.66
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 12.96 prices above its benchmark range — LMT looks rich relative to book.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
12.96
- LMT
- 12.96
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 20.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 1.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 12.96 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 4.31% |