IQV vs. TEM: IQVIA vs. Tempus AI Stock Comparison

Company Profile

IQVIA (IQV) and Tempus AI (TEM) are both classified in the Life Sciences Tools & Services sub-industry within the broader Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

IQVIA (IQV) has been public since May 9, 2013, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Tempus AI (TEM) listed on June 14, 2024 and still has a shorter public-market record.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Tempus AI (TEM) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.34, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas IQVIA (IQV) is closer to market-like at 1.14 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative ROE of -37.55%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile IQVIA (IQV) reports 21.39%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative net margin of -12.54%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile IQVIA (IQV) reports 8.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative operating margin of -13.82%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile IQVIA (IQV) reports 13.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Tempus AI (TEM) at 83.41% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while IQVIA (IQV) at 5.87% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TEM.

Only one side can be read here: IQVIA (IQV) reports EPS growth of 4.67%, ranked against its industry; Tempus AI (TEM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while IQVIA (IQV) at 0.83 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for IQV.

Debt sits unusually high against shareholders’ equity for both IQVIA (IQV) at 2.40 and Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.86 — each debt-to-equity ratio is above its industry benchmark range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither IQVIA (IQV) nor Tempus AI (TEM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither IQVIA (IQV) nor Tempus AI (TEM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: IQVIA (IQV) trades at 33.07 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Tempus AI (TEM) has no P/E ratio this period.

IQVIA (IQV) at 2.59 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Tempus AI (TEM) at 9.19 prices around its industry’s middle — IQV costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Both look rich against book: IQVIA (IQV) at 6.73 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Tempus AI (TEM) at 27.66 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics