IP vs. MLM: International Paper vs. Martin Marietta Materials Stock Comparison
How do International Paper (IP) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
International Paper (IP) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but IP is classified in Containers & Packaging while MLM is classified in Construction Materials.
| Profile Item | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | International Paper Co. | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Construction Materials |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Paper & Plastic Packaging Products & Materials | Construction Materials |
| Market Capitalization | 18.29 billion USD | 36.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | February 17, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -2.70% | -12.23% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 6.64% | 6.32% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -2.14% | 5.43% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.71% | 29.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.61% | -33.19% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.09M | 805.11K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.16 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.24 | -0.75 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
International Paper (IP) reports a negative ROE of -22.30%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) reports 6.02%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IP
Materials industry group
-22.30%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- IP
- -22.30%
- Min
- -32.81%
MLM
Materials industry group
6.02%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MLM
- 6.02%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
International Paper (IP) reports a negative net margin of -14.32%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) reports 31.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IP
Materials industry group
-14.32%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- IP
- -14.32%
- Min
- -20.40%
MLM
Materials industry group
31.88%
- Max
- 38.66%
- MLM
- 31.88%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both International Paper (IP) at 5.89% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 22.29% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
IP
Materials industry group
5.89%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- IP
- 5.89%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
MLM
Materials industry group
22.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- MLM
- 22.29%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -22.30% | 6.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.60% | 3.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -14.32% | 31.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.89% | 22.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 29.78% | 26.74% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
International Paper (IP) at 49.25% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 8.62% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for IP.
EPS Growth
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at -42.09% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while International Paper (IP) at -542.68% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 49.25% | 8.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.75% | -0.06% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -542.68% | -42.09% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 10.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 1.63 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while International Paper (IP) at 0.99 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for IP.
IP
Materials industry group
0.99
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- IP
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.16
MLM
Materials industry group
1.63
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- MLM
- 1.63
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both International Paper (IP) at 0.79 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.75 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
IP
Materials industry group
0.79
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- IP
- 0.79
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
0.75
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- MLM
- 0.75
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.99 | 1.63 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.40 | 5.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.63% pays an industry-typical yield; International Paper (IP) at 5.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
IP
Materials industry group
5.40%
- IP
- 5.40%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
0.63%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MLM
- 0.63%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
International Paper (IP) reports payout ratio above 100% at 402.17%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) reports 24.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IP
Materials industry group
402.17%
- IP
- 402.17%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
24.85%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- MLM
- 24.85%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.40% | 0.63% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 402.17% | 24.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) trades at 38.67 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while International Paper (IP) has no P/E ratio this period.
IP
Materials industry group
--
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
- IP
- --
MLM
Materials industry group
38.67
- Max
- 59.00
- MLM
- 38.67
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
International Paper (IP) at 0.76 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 5.11 sits in the pricier quartile — MLM costs more per dollar of sales.
IP
Materials industry group
0.76
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- IP
- 0.76
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
5.11
- Max
- 9.62
- MLM
- 5.11
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both International Paper (IP) at 1.39 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 2.09 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
IP
Materials industry group
1.39
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- IP
- 1.39
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
MLM
Materials industry group
2.09
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- MLM
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 38.67 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.76 | 5.11 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.39 | 2.09 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.53% | 4.54% |