BHP vs. MLM: BHP vs. Martin Marietta Materials Stock Comparison
How do BHP (BHP) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
BHP (BHP) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but BHP is classified in Metals & Mining while MLM is classified in Construction Materials.
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) trades as ordinary local shares, while BHP (BHP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | BHP Group Ltd. Sponsored ADR | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Australia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Construction Materials |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Construction Materials |
| Market Capitalization | 203.04 billion USD | 36.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 17, 1994 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 55.75% | -12.23% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.27% | 6.32% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.05% | 5.43% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.60% | 29.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.21% | -33.19% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.84M | 805.11K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.49 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.22 | -0.75 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 24.00% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 6.02% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BHP.
BHP
Materials industry group
24.00%
- Max
- 52.88%
- BHP
- 24.00%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
MLM
Materials industry group
6.02%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MLM
- 6.02%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both BHP (BHP) at 16.73% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 31.88% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
BHP
Materials industry group
16.73%
- Max
- 38.66%
- BHP
- 16.73%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
MLM
Materials industry group
31.88%
- Max
- 38.66%
- MLM
- 31.88%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 43.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 22.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BHP
Materials industry group
43.34%
- Max
- 66.70%
- BHP
- 43.34%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
MLM
Materials industry group
22.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- MLM
- 22.29%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.00% | 6.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.43% | 3.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.73% | 31.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 43.34% | 22.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 85.92% | 26.74% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 14.63% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 8.62% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 8.91% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at -42.09% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.63% | 8.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.97% | -0.06% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.91% | -42.09% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.80% | 10.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 1.89 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 1.63 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BHP
Materials industry group
1.89
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- BHP
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
MLM
Materials industry group
1.63
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- MLM
- 1.63
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 0.50 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.75 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BHP
Materials industry group
0.50
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- BHP
- 0.50
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
0.75
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- MLM
- 0.75
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.89 | 1.63 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.50 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.33 | 5.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 2.19% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.63% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BHP the richer one.
BHP
Materials industry group
2.19%
- Max
- 4.52%
- BHP
- 2.19%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
0.63%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MLM
- 0.63%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 24.85% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while BHP (BHP) at 68.84% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
BHP
Materials industry group
68.84%
- Max
- 83.62%
- BHP
- 68.84%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
24.85%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- MLM
- 24.85%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.19% | 0.63% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 68.84% | 24.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 20.70 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 38.67 sits in the richer quartile — MLM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
BHP
Materials industry group
20.70
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- BHP
- 20.70
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
MLM
Materials industry group
38.67
- Max
- 59.00
- MLM
- 38.67
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 3.46 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 5.11 sits in the pricier quartile — MLM costs more per dollar of sales.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.46
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- BHP
- 3.46
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
5.11
- Max
- 9.62
- MLM
- 5.11
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 2.09 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while BHP (BHP) at 3.98 carries an above-peer premium to book — BHP is pricier on assets.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.98
- Max
- 6.59
- BHP
- 3.98
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
MLM
Materials industry group
2.09
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- MLM
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.70 | 38.67 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.46 | 5.11 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.98 | 2.09 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.72% | 4.54% |