BHP vs. MLM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at BHP and MLM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
BHP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MLM is a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | BHP Group Limited | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
| Country | Australia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Construction Materials |
| Market Capitalization | 142.34 billion USD | 38.37 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | February 17, 1994 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of BHP and MLM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -0.12% | 1.34% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 9.37% | 12.22% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 13.77% | 31.21% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -4.58% | 22.69% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -1.50% | 0.96% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 5.92% | 23.20% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 8.68M | 0.31M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 8.61M | 0.38M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 19.92% | 20.56% |
| Beta | 0.91 | 1.18 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
BHP
19.36%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 41.55%
- Q3
- 17.74%
- Median
- 9.00%
- Q1
- 1.65%
- Min
- -21.32%
In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, BHP’s Return on Equity of 19.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
MLM
11.88%
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 24.24%
- Q3
- 15.27%
- Median
- 10.51%
- Q1
- 5.28%
- Min
- -5.22%
MLM’s Return on Equity of 11.88% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
BHP
17.59%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 43.69%
- Q3
- 19.12%
- Median
- 6.48%
- Q1
- 1.50%
- Min
- -20.21%
BHP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
MLM
16.47%
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 44.75%
- Q3
- 22.43%
- Median
- 9.02%
- Q1
- 4.99%
- Min
- -4.83%
MLM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
BHP
37.97%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 71.84%
- Q3
- 32.31%
- Median
- 12.50%
- Q1
- 2.69%
- Min
- -23.81%
An Operating Profit Margin of 37.97% places BHP in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
MLM
23.04%
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 31.89%
- Q3
- 18.90%
- Median
- 11.67%
- Q1
- 8.77%
- Min
- -2.06%
An Operating Profit Margin of 23.04% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 19.36% | 11.88% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 8.61% | 6.25% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 17.59% | 16.47% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 37.97% | 23.04% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | -- | 29.44% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BHP
1.46
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 5.27
- Q3
- 3.04
- Median
- 1.96
- Q1
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.13
BHP’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
MLM
2.35
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 5.14
- Q3
- 3.18
- Median
- 2.00
- Q1
- 1.13
- Min
- 0.76
MLM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
BHP
0.51
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 1.10
- Q3
- 0.51
- Median
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.09
- Min
- 0.00
BHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Metals & Mining industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
MLM
0.58
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 1.12
- Q3
- 0.82
- Median
- 0.61
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MLM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
BHP
6.06
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 51.62
- Q3
- 22.73
- Median
- 5.76
- Q1
- 0.82
- Min
- -21.72
BHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
MLM
16.36
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 54.89
- Q3
- 34.24
- Median
- 7.96
- Q1
- 4.28
- Min
- -6.24
MLM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.46 | 2.35 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.11 | 1.21 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.51 | 0.58 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.06 | 16.36 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BHP
4.57%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 8.17%
- Q3
- 3.57%
- Median
- 1.25%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 4.57%, BHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
MLM
0.51%
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 6.59%
- Q3
- 4.78%
- Median
- 2.19%
- Q1
- 0.85%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM’s Dividend Yield of 0.51% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
BHP
70.99%
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 138.08%
- Q3
- 62.06%
- Median
- 33.17%
- Q1
- 10.41%
- Min
- 0.00%
BHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.99% is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
MLM
17.62%
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 149.16%
- Q3
- 76.08%
- Median
- 33.22%
- Q1
- 14.03%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.62% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.57% | 0.51% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 70.99% | 17.62% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
BHP
15.52
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 83.04
- Q3
- 41.69
- Median
- 20.30
- Q1
- 12.95
- Min
- 1.75
BHP’s P/E Ratio of 15.52 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
MLM
34.42
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 33.62
- Q3
- 19.63
- Median
- 12.15
- Q1
- 7.04
- Min
- 2.32
At 34.42, MLM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
BHP
2.73
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 9.28
- Q3
- 4.28
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.16
BHP’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
MLM
5.67
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 3.73
- Q3
- 2.10
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.21
With a P/S Ratio of 5.67, MLM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
BHP
2.55
Metals & Mining Industry
- Max
- 4.68
- Q3
- 2.45
- Median
- 1.55
- Q1
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.34
BHP’s P/B Ratio of 2.55 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
MLM
3.53
Construction Materials Industry
- Max
- 4.48
- Q3
- 2.26
- Median
- 1.26
- Q1
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.11
MLM’s P/B Ratio of 3.53 is in the upper tier for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | BHP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 15.52 | 34.42 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.73 | 5.67 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 2.55 | 3.53 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 15.73 | 38.75 |