IONQ vs. ZBRA: IonQ vs. Zebra Stock Comparison

Company Profile

IonQ (IONQ) and Zebra (ZBRA) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals while ZBRA is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components.

Zebra (ZBRA) has more than two decades of public-market history since August 15, 1991, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

IonQ (IONQ) is heavily traded at around 22.02M shares per day, whereas Zebra (ZBRA) sees a more moderate 596.00K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90% and Zebra (ZBRA) at 16.46% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Zebra (ZBRA) at 9.80% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Zebra (ZBRA) reports 14.75%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

IonQ (IONQ) at 201.85% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Zebra (ZBRA) at 8.33%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: Zebra (ZBRA) reports EPS growth of -19.65%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Zebra (ZBRA) at 0.57 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Zebra (ZBRA) at 0.78 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither IonQ (IONQ) nor Zebra (ZBRA) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither IonQ (IONQ) nor Zebra (ZBRA) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Zebra (ZBRA) at 26.03 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for IONQ, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Zebra (ZBRA) at 2.47 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while IonQ (IONQ) at 39.84 clears its benchmark range — IONQ looks notably rich on sales.

On P/B ratio, both IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 and Zebra (ZBRA) at 4.26 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics