Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ANET’s market capitalization of 128.76 billion USD is substantially larger than IONQ’s 11.61 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

IONQ carries a higher beta at 2.59, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ANET (beta: 1.38) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolANETIONQ
Company NameArista Networks, Inc.IonQ, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer HardwareComputer Hardware
CEOJayshree V. UllalNiccolo Mcleod de Masi
Price102.52 USD44.39 USD
Market Cap128.76 billion USD11.61 billion USD
Beta1.382.59
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 6, 2014January 4, 2021
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ANET

32.05%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IONQ

-63.35%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -63.35%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROE against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

ANET

23.89%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, ANET’s Return on Invested Capital of 23.89% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

IONQ

-31.70%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

IONQ has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -31.70%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROIC against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

ANET

40.72%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.72% places ANET in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IONQ

-753.20%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -753.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

ANET

42.27%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 42.27% places ANET in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IONQ

-592.84%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -592.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)32.05%-63.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.86%-38.15%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)23.89%-31.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.72%-753.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)42.27%-592.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.09%50.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ANET

3.93

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.93 aligns with the median group of the Computer Hardware industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IONQ

13.17

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 13.17 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ANET

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ANET is currently unavailable.

IONQ

0.02

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ANET

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ANET is currently unavailable.

IONQ

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

Interest Coverage Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETIONQ
Current Ratio (TTM)3.9313.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.3112.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)--0.02
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)--0.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.580.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ANET and IONQ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ANET

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ANET

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

-0.01%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -0.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%-0.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ANET

42.66

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

At 42.66, ANET’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IONQ

-31.31

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

IONQ has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.31. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ANET

1.80

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

IONQ

13.67

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ANET

17.31

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

ANET’s P/S Ratio of 17.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IONQ

269.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 269.73, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Computer Hardware industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ANET

12.77

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

ANET’s P/B Ratio of 12.77 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IONQ

13.27

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 13.27 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ANET vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Computer Hardware industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)42.66-31.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.8013.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)17.31269.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)12.7713.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)34.02-59.29
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)39.62-49.02
EV-to-Sales (TTM)17.07266.43