IONQ vs. MSI: IonQ vs. Motorola Stock Comparison

Company Profile

IonQ (IONQ) and Motorola (MSI) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals while MSI is classified in Communications Equipment.

Motorola (MSI) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 2, 1962, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

IonQ (IONQ) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Motorola (MSI) is closer to market-like at 0.84 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

IonQ (IONQ) is heavily traded at around 22.02M shares per day, whereas Motorola (MSI) sees a more moderate 973.41K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Motorola (MSI) at 76.98% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Motorola (MSI) at 16.54% also retains a top-quartile share.

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Motorola (MSI) reports 24.62%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

IonQ (IONQ) at 201.85% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Motorola (MSI) at 8.00%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: Motorola (MSI) reports EPS growth of 38.14%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Motorola (MSI) at 1.10 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Motorola (MSI) at 3.46 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Motorola (MSI) reports a yield of 0.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Motorola (MSI) reports a payout of 38.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Motorola (MSI) at 41.39 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Both look expensive on sales: Motorola (MSI) at 6.75 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and IonQ (IONQ) at 39.84 prices even higher, above its industry range.

IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Motorola (MSI) at 27.75 prices above its benchmark range — MSI looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics