INIO vs. IR: Innio vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Innio (INIO) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but INIO is classified in Electrical Equipment while IR is classified in Machinery.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) has been public since May 12, 2017 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Innio (INIO) only listed on June 8, 2026 — long-window metrics on the INIO side should be interpreted with caution.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Innio (INIO) reports a negative beta of -1.88, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Ingersoll Rand (IR) has a non-negative beta of 1.12.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both INIO and IR need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Ingersoll Rand (IR) earns 13.41% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Innio (INIO) has no ROE this period.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Innio (INIO) at 2.71%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Innio (INIO) at 16.58%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Innio (INIO) at 22.13% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for INIO.

Innio (INIO) at 59.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Innio (INIO) at 1.27 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for INIO.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Innio (INIO) at 8.53 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a yield of 0.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Innio (INIO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a payout of 2.27%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Innio (INIO) at 105.92 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for INIO’s trailing earnings.

Innio (INIO) at 2.94 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Innio (INIO) at 30.53 prices above its benchmark range — INIO looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics