ICLR vs. TEM: ICON vs. Tempus AI Stock Comparison

Company Profile

ICON (ICLR) and Tempus AI (TEM) are both classified in the Life Sciences Tools & Services sub-industry within the broader Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

ICON (ICLR) carries decades of public-market history since May 15, 1998, while Tempus AI (TEM) listed on June 14, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the ICLR side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Tempus AI (TEM) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.34, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas ICON (ICLR) is closer to market-like at 1.17 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative ROE of -37.55%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile ICON (ICLR) reports 4.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative net margin of -12.54%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile ICON (ICLR) reports 5.26%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative operating margin of -13.82%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile ICON (ICLR) reports 10.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Tempus AI (TEM) at 83.41% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while ICON (ICLR) at 0.76% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TEM.

Only one side can be read here: ICON (ICLR) reports EPS growth of -71.56%, ranked against its industry; Tempus AI (TEM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ICON (ICLR) at 1.32 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ICLR.

ICON (ICLR) at 0.38 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.86 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither ICON (ICLR) nor Tempus AI (TEM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither ICON (ICLR) nor Tempus AI (TEM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: ICON (ICLR) trades at 81.90 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Tempus AI (TEM) has no P/E ratio this period.

ICON (ICLR) at 1.86 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Tempus AI (TEM) at 9.19 prices around its industry’s middle — ICLR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

ICON (ICLR) at 1.68 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Tempus AI (TEM) at 27.66 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.

Valuation Metrics