IBM vs. QNT: IBM vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

IBM (IBM) and Quantinuum (QNT) are both classified in the IT Consulting & Other Services sub-industry within the broader IT Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

IBM (IBM) has been public since January 2, 1962, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Quantinuum (QNT) listed only on June 4, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. IBM (IBM) has a non-negative beta of 0.79.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both IBM and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: IBM (IBM) earns 34.77% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no ROE this period.

IBM (IBM) at 15.99% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.00%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative operating margin of -6,939.56%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile IBM (IBM) reports 16.97%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while IBM (IBM) at 7.62% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for QNT.

Only one side can be read here: IBM (IBM) reports EPS growth of 73.72%, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while IBM (IBM) at 0.86 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while IBM (IBM) at 1.85 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Quantinuum (QNT) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile IBM (IBM) reports a yield of 2.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantinuum (QNT) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile IBM (IBM) reports a payout of 57.51%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: IBM (IBM) trades at 20.90 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantinuum (QNT) has no P/E ratio this period.

IBM (IBM) at 3.31 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 clears its benchmark range — QNT looks notably rich on sales.

IBM (IBM) at 6.52 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 64.89 prices above its benchmark range — QNT looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics