Seek Returns logo

HUBS vs. OKTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HUBS and OKTA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHUBSOKTA
Company NameHubSpot, Inc.Okta, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareIT Services
Market Capitalization27.28 billion USD16.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 9, 2014April 7, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HUBS and OKTA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HUBS vs. OKTA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHUBSOKTA
5-Day Price Return-13.11%2.04%
13-Week Price Return-21.08%-8.27%
26-Week Price Return-25.81%-19.58%
52-Week Price Return-17.18%23.94%
Month-to-Date Return-5.89%-1.15%
Year-to-Date Return-36.82%16.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.05M2.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.88M3.97M
3-Month Volatility43.50%32.47%
Beta1.470.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HUBS

-0.62%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

HUBS has a negative Return on Equity of -0.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

OKTA

2.59%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

OKTA’s Return on Equity of 2.59% is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-0.42%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

HUBS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.42%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

OKTA

6.08%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

OKTA’s Net Profit Margin of 6.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HUBS

-2.59%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

HUBS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.59%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

OKTA

3.18%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

OKTA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.18% is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHUBSOKTA
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.62%2.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.32%1.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.42%6.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.59%3.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)84.55%76.91%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

1.79

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

HUBS’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

OKTA

1.35

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

OKTA’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

HUBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

OKTA

0.13

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, OKTA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

-2.05

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

HUBS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

OKTA

-9.31

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

OKTA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHUBSOKTA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.791.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.701.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-2.05-9.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

HUBS vs. OKTA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HUBS vs. OKTA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

OKTA

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OKTA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

OKTA

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OKTA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHUBSOKTA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for HUBS is currently unavailable.

OKTA

95.72

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

At 95.72, OKTA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the IT Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HUBS

8.66

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

HUBS’s P/S Ratio of 8.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

OKTA

5.82

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

OKTA’s P/S Ratio of 5.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HUBS

14.22

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

HUBS’s P/B Ratio of 14.22 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

OKTA

2.54

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

OKTA’s P/B Ratio of 2.54 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HUBS vs. OKTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHUBSOKTA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--95.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.665.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.222.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.1019.19