HOOD vs. NMR: Robinhood Markets vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) and Nomura (NMR) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Nomura (NMR) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 17, 2001, whereas Robinhood Markets (HOOD) listed on July 29, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.52, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Nomura (NMR) is closer to market-like at 0.79 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) is heavily traded at around 20.63M shares per day, whereas Nomura (NMR) sees a more moderate 789.26K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 21.45% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 39.04% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 17.12%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 48.10% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 51.58% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for HOOD.

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 31.41% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a yield of 620.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a payout of 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 37.29 sits in the richer quartile — HOOD needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 14.34 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 7.29 carries an above-peer premium to book — HOOD is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics