HOOD vs. MCO: Robinhood Markets vs. Moody's Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) and Moody's (MCO) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though HOOD is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while MCO falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.

Moody's (MCO) has more than two decades of public-market history since October 31, 1994, whereas Robinhood Markets (HOOD) listed on July 29, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.52, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Moody's (MCO) is closer to market-like at 1.28 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) is heavily traded at around 20.63M shares per day, whereas Moody's (MCO) sees a more moderate 817.57K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Moody's (MCO) at 76.74% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 21.45%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

For every dollar of sales, both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 39.04% and Moody's (MCO) at 35.26% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 48.10% and Moody's (MCO) at 46.27% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 51.58% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Moody's (MCO) at 8.89% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for HOOD.

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 31.41% and Moody's (MCO) at 21.40% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services and Moody's (MCO) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services and Moody's (MCO) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Moody's (MCO) reports a yield of 0.78%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Moody's (MCO) reports a payout of 24.59%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 37.29 and Moody's (MCO) at 30.85 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 14.34 and Moody's (MCO) at 10.66 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

Both look rich against book: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 7.29 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Moody's (MCO) at 26.68 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics