HONA vs. PWR: Honeywell Aerospace vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HONA is classified in Aerospace & Defense while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.

Quanta Services (PWR) has been public since February 12, 1998, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) listed only on June 15, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative beta of -5.78, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Quanta Services (PWR) has a non-negative beta of 1.29.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both HONA and PWR need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Quanta Services (PWR) earns 18.02% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) has no ROE this period.

Both Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 11.25% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 23.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 12.68% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.

Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at -36.80% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PWR.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Quanta Services (PWR) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.71 against its industry range, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Quanta Services (PWR) reports a yield of 0.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Quanta Services (PWR) reports a payout of 3.98%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 43.32 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

On P/S ratio, both Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 2.69 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative P/B ratio of -18.85, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Quanta Services (PWR) reports 7.73, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics