HON vs. PWR: Honeywell vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do Honeywell (HON) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Honeywell (HON) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HON is classified in Industrial Conglomerates while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Honeywell International Inc. | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 69.74 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 14.14% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.90% | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.32% | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.11% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -25.21% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.82M | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.36 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.52 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 44.39% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
44.39%
- HON
- 44.39%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 18.68% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
18.68%
- Max
- 27.47%
- HON
- 18.68%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Honeywell (HON) at 16.92% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
16.92%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- HON
- 16.92%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 44.39% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.13% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 18.68% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.92% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.21% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Honeywell (HON) at 7.85% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PWR.
EPS Growth
Both Honeywell (HON) at -8.27% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 12.77% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.85% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.82% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -8.27% | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.20% | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Honeywell (HON) at 0.96 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.96
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- HON
- 0.96
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Honeywell (HON) at 0.76 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.76
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- HON
- 0.76
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.96 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.23 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.09% pays an industry-typical yield; Honeywell (HON) at 3.63% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.63%
- HON
- 3.63%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 3.98% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Honeywell (HON) at 38.87% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
38.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- HON
- 38.87%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.63% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 38.87% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 10.91 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
10.91
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- HON
- 10.91
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Honeywell (HON) at 1.85 and Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
1.85
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- HON
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Honeywell (HON) at 3.12 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 carries an above-peer premium to book — PWR is pricier on assets.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.12
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- HON
- 3.12
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HON | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.91 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.85 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.12 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.07% | 3.78% |